Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is
H0: μ = 32.6
The alternative hypothesis is
Ha: μ ≠ 32.6
The calculated test statistic is 2.66 for the right tail and - 2.66 for the left tail
Since the critical values for both tails is ± 2.145, we would compare the critical values with the test statistic values
In order to reject the null hypothesis, the test statistic must be smaller than - 2.145 or greater than 2.145
Since - 2.66 < - 2.145 and 2.66 > 2.145, we would reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean is different from 32.6.
2) Test statistic: t = 2.66. Critical values: t = ±1.96
Since - 2.66 < - 1.96 and 2.66 > 1.96, we would reject the null hypothesis. Then
Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean is different from 32.6.
2.2 x 10 to the 5th power.
Answer:
-Triangle RST is congruent to Triangle QST by SSS.
Step-by-step explanation:
-Since the questions state RST first, you must look at the other triangle in the same way. So therefore giving you triangle QST. Next we know that the sides of both triangles are congruent, giving you the anger to be SSS.
Answer:
i think the answer is a. but not for sure