In Inductive reasoning, scientists are gathering information and facts before creating a theory whereas, in deductive reasoning, a rule or theory is already existing and scientists gather additional examples or data to analyze the existing theory. hence, The correct statement is option C.
<h3 /><h3>What is deductive reasoning?</h3>
Deductive reasoning is a logical procedure wherein an end is primarily based totally on the concordance of more than one premise which might be normally assumed to be true. Deductive reasoning is from time to time known as top-down logic.
the missing information in the question:
a. Scientists had to be inducted into a society in order to conduct experiments.
b. Scientists no longer had to prove their ideas.
c. Scientists now gathered information and facts before creating a theory.
d. Inductive reasoning was faster and easier than deductive reasoning.
Therefore, The correct statement is option C.
learn more about deductive reasoning:
brainly.com/question/860494
#SPJ1
Not finding a place to live, or not adjusting to the culture.
Explanation:
Nepal moved from unitary system with a three-level federal system of government. As federalism accelerates, the national health system can also speed up its own decentralization process, reduce disparities in access, and improve health outcomes. The turn towards federalism creates several potential opportunities for the national healthcare system. This is because decision making has been devolved to the federal, provincial and local governments, and so they can make decisions that are more representative of their localised health needs. The major challenge during the transition phase is to ensure that there are uninterrupted supplies of medical commodities and services. This requires scaling up the ability of local bodies to manage drug procurement and general logistics and adequate human resource in local healthcare centres. This article documents the efforts made so far in context of health sector federalization and synthesizes the progress and challenges to date and potential ways forward. This paper is written at a time while it is critical to review the federalism initiatives and develop way forward. As Nepal progress towards the federalized health system, we propose that the challenges inherent with the transition are critically analysed and mitigated while unfolding the potential of federal health system.
Keywords: Challenges and Opportunities, Decentralization, Federalism, Health Reform, Health Sector, Nepal
Background
With the promulgation of its constitution in 2015, Nepal replaced a unitary government with a federal system of government.1 This process has made Nepal a federal democratic republic governed with three levels of government: a federal level, seven provinces and 753 local government.2 It also led to local elections in late 2017 for the first time in two decades, a landmark achievement signalling that federalism is being implemented.2 With the ongoing restructuring of the health system delivery, this article aims to synthesize the progress and challenges to date and potential ways forward based on the perspective of the federal government. The progress of federalization in Nepal is also considered in light of the experiences of other countries that have implemented federalism, and these remarks may be pertinent to progressively guide the management of the health sector federalization.
Current Situation in Nepal
During the last few decades, Nepal Government has made significant progress towards reducing maternal, under-five and infant mortality rates. During the same period, Nepal was able to halt and reverse the trends of tuberculosis
Answer:
A. Functionalist perspective
Explanation:
Answer:
Behaviorsim
Explanation:
When John B. Watson developed behaviorism, he thought that any individual, no matter where he/she came from, could be trained in a specific way under the adequate conditions. Behaviorism holds that a person develops his/her behavior based on conditioning, and conditioning takes place when the individual interacts with the environment. Supporters of this theory think that we change the way we act depending on the environmental stimuli.
