Answer:
C) would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong?
Explanation:
Solomon Asch research was designed to answer a straightforward question, namely: <em>would people still conform to the group if the group opinion was clearly wrong? </em>This research was made by Asch to test conformity in ambiguous situations. Two important conclusions of the research are that people tend to conform to the majority of the group of opinion even if they know their answer is wrong, and that the size of the group is important when deciding.
They could be separated by mountains or rivers and could be influenced by neighboring peoples.
Answer:
The details from the myths support the idea that both the Maori and Haida understand the value of determination is no other than the statement
"The brothers in the Maori myth try several different ways to separate the sky and earth, and the Raven in the Haida myth continues to wail until he's given the box he wants"
Explanation:
This statement portray a character or determination and resilience as they both are determined to try different ways to "separate the sky"
The answer would be the conflict perspective. This was proposed by Karl Marx, claims society is in a condition of unending clash in light of rivalry for restricted assets. It holds that social request is kept up by mastery and power, instead of agreement and congruity.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the third option. <span>When a psychoanalytic therapist tells you what your dreams mean, he is giving you the latent part of the dream. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
