Answer:
11.07%
Explanation:
The formula to compute WACC is shown below:
= Weightage of debt × cost of debt × ( 1- tax rate) + (Weightage of common stock) × (cost of common stock)
= (0.25 × 8%) × ( 1 - 34%) + (0.75 × 13%)
= 1.32% + 9.75%
= 11.07%
We simply multiply the weighatge with its capital structure so that the correct weightage cost of capital can come.
Attracting and retaining employees with the skills, abilities, and experience is a key component of a<u> human resource</u> management system.
<h3>What is
human resource management system?</h3>
Human resource management system has to do with carrying out specific function such as effectively managing everything that has to do with human resource.
Human resource management system is important for companies as it enables them to choose employees that has the best skills and experience to move the company forward so as to enable the company achieve their goals.
Therefore attracting and retaining employees is a key component of a<u> human resource</u> management system.
Learn more about Human resource management system here:brainly.com/question/21976973
Answer:
Article 2 of the UCC(Uniform Commercial Code).
Explanation:
UCC is said to be an acronym which stands for the Uniform Commercial Code; this is seen also to govern many different forms of contract interactions. Article 2 in most cases are seen to cover common issues ranging from
i). Goods definition of i.e any tangible item that can be moved.
ii). Situations involving missing terms in a contract, such as a missing quantity, price etc.
iii) Contract modifications and lastly
iv). Exchanges of consideration for items of value.
Alot of research has shown in most cases that article 2 is a popularly cited provision in this body of statutes, since it governs contracts for the sale of goods between merchants or between a merchant and a non-merchant.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Cash Dr $98,800
Finance charge Dr ($120,000 × 1%) $1,200
To Liability - Financing Arrangement $100,000
(being receipts of cash is recorded)
Here cash and finance charge is debited as it increased the assets and expenses and liability is credited as it also increased the liabilities. Also, the cash & expenses contains normal debit balance and liabilities contains normal credit balance
