Answer:
Total sales revenue use excel function : ( SUMIF. =sumif(range, criteria, [sum_range] )
For each of the stores: Use excel function: For Store 1: =sumif(B4:B99,1,I4:I99) then repeat same for Store 2 to store 8
Step-by-step explanation:
To modify the spreadsheet to calculate the total sales revenue we will add a column " sales revenue "
multiply values of column : ( unit sold * unit price ) to get Total sales revenue. then use excel function : ( SUMIF. =sumif(range, criteria, [sum_range] ) to find Total sales revenue
calculate the total revenue for each of the 8 stores using a pivot table using "store identification number" in row and " sales revenue " in values field
To get the sales revenue ; replace " store identification value" with sales region " column
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Hey there!</em>
<u><em>Given info</em></u>
9(x + 4)
<u><em>Solve!</em></u>
9*x = <u>9x</u>
9*4 = <u>36</u>
<u><em>Answer</em></u>
<u>9x + 36</u>
D. 9x + 36
<em>Hope this helps :)</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
The expressions are not properly written
Given
RS = 4x – 9
ST = 19
RT = 8x – 14
Based on the given parameters, the addition postulate below is true
RS+ST = RT
Substitute
4x-9+19 = 8x-14
collect like terms
4x-8x = -14-19+9
-4x = -33+9
-4x = -24
x = -24/-4
x = 6
Get RS:
RS = 4x-9
RS = 4(6)- 9
RS = 24-9
RS = 15
Get RT:
RT = 8x - 14
RT = 8(6)-14
RT = 48-14
RT = 34
Answer:
Tanisha's lunch cost $9.22.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that,
Total bill = $18.94
Cost for Madison cost = $9.72
Total cost = Tanisha's lunch + Madison's lunch
18.94 = Tanisha's lunch + 9.72
Tanisha's lunch = 18.94 - 9.72
Tanisha's lunch = 9.22
So, Tanisha's lunch cost $9.22.
Answer:
0.5<2-√2<0.6
Step-by-step explanation:
The original inequality states that 1.4<√2<1.5
For the second inequality, you can think of 2-√2 as 2+(-√2).
Because of the "properties of inequalities", we know that when a positive inequality is being turned into a negative, the numbers need to swap and become negative. So, the original inequality becomes -1.5<-√2<-1.4. (Notice how the √2 becomes negative, too). This makes sense because -1.5 is less than -1.4.
Using our new inequality, we can solve the problem. Instead of 2+(-√2), we are going to switch "-√2" with both possibilities of -1.5 and -1.6. For -1.5, we would get 2+(-1.5), or 0.5. For -1.4, we would get 2+(-1.4), or 0.6.
Now, we insert the new numbers into the equation _<2-√2<_. The 0.5 would take the original equation's "1.4" place, and 0.6 would take 1.5's. In the end, you'd get 0.5<2-√2<0.6. All possible values of 2-√2 would be between 0.5 and 0.6.
Hope this helped!
