How many moles are in 63 grams of water (H2O)?

When CO2 decomposes into oxygen and carbon, it gives a gram ratio of 2.67:1 O2:C. When a 32.4g of CO2 decomposes, how many grams

Rufina [12.5K]

Answer : The mass of carbon and oxygen produced is 8.83 g and 23.6 g respectively.

Explanation :

Law of conservation of mass : It states that mass can neither be created nor be destroyed but it can only be transformed from one form to another form.

This also means that total mass on the reactant side must be equal to the total mass on the product side.

The balanced chemical reaction will be,

$CO_2\rightarrow O_2+C$

As we are given:

$\text{Mass of }O_2}:\text{Mass of }C=2.67:1{$

According to the law of conservation of mass,

Total mass of $CO_2$ = Mass of $O_2$ + Mass of C

Total mass of $CO_2$ = 2.67 + 1 = 3.67 g

Now we have to calculate the mass of $O_2$ and C.

$\text{Mass of }O_2=\frac{\text{Given mass of }CO_2}{\text{Total mass of }CO_2}\times \text{Given mass of }O_2=\frac{32.4g}{3.67g}\times 2.67=23.6g$

and,

$\text{Mass of }C=\frac{\text{Given mass of }CO_2}{\text{Total mass of }CO_2}\times \text{Given mass of }C=\frac{32.4g}{3.67g}\times 1=8.83g$

Therefore, the mass of carbon and oxygen produced is 8.83 g and 23.6 g respectively.

6 0

3 years ago

The main reason that cs2 has a higher boiling point than co2 is that cs2

OlgaM077 [116]

Explanation:

Inspite of having similar intermolecular forces, CS2 has a higher boiling point than CO2, since it has a greater molar mass. The potential energy of molecules reduces until a certain level as they get closer to each other. Although the polarity of both CO2 and CS2 are cancelled because of their linear structure.

4 0

3 years ago

After he conducted cathode ray tube experiments proving the existence of negatively charged particles we now call electrons, Tho

Lina20 [59]

Answer:

Answer is explained below;

Explanation:

In 1904, after the discovery of the electron, the English physicist Sir J.J. Thomson proposed the plum pudding model of an atom. In this model, the atom had a positively-charged space with negatively charged electrons embedded inside it i.e., like a pudding (positively charged space) with plums (electrons) inside.

In 1911, another physicist Ernest Rutherford proposed another model known as the Rutherford model or planetary model of the atom that describes the structure of atoms. In this model, the small and dense atom has a positively charged core called the nucleus. Also, he proposed that just like the planets revolving around the Sun, the negatively charged electrons are moving around the nucleus.

By conducting a gold foil experiment, Rutherford disproved Thomson's model. In this experiment, positively charged alpha particles emitted from a radioactive source enclosed within a protective lead were used which was then focused into a narrow beam. It was then passed through a slit in front of which a thin section of gold foil was placed. A fluorescent screen (coated with zinc sulfide) was also placed in front of the slit to detect alpha particles which on striking the fluorescent screen would produce scintillation (a burst of light) which was visible through a microscope attached to the back of the screen.

He observed that most of the alpha particles passed straight through the gold foil without any resistance and this implied that atoms contain a large amount of open space. The slight deflection of some of the alpha particles, the large-angle scattering of other alpha particles and even the bouncing back of a very few alpha particles toward the source suggested their interactions with other positively charged particles inside the atom.

So, he concluded that only a dense and positively charged particle such as the nucleus would be responsible for such strong repulsion. Also, the negatively charged electrons electrically balanced the positive nuclear charge and they moved around the nucleus in circular orbits. Between the electrons and nucleus, there was an electrostatic force of attraction just like the gravitational force of attraction between the sun and the revolving planets.

Later, the Rutherford model was replaced by the Bohr atomic model.

6 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP ITS DUE TODAY!

Yuri [45]

Answer:

At one atmosphere and twenty-five degrees Celsius, could you turn it into a liquid by cooling it down? Um, and the key here is that the triple point eyes that minus fifty six point six degrees Celsius and it's at five point eleven ATMs. So at one atmospheric pressure, there's no way that you're ever going to reach the liquid days. So the first part of this question is the answer The answer to the first part of a question is no. How could you instead make the liquid at twenty-five degrees Celsius? Well, the critical point is at thirty-one point one degrees Celsius. So you know, if you're twenty-five, if you increase the pressure instead, you will briefly by it, be able to form a liquid. And if you continue Teo, you know, increase the pressure eventually form a salad, so increasing the pressure is the second part. If you increase the pressure of co two thirty-seven degrees Celsius, will you ever liquefy? No. Because then, if you're above thirty-one point one degrees Celsius in temperature. You'LL never be able to actually form the liquid. Instead, you'LL only is able Teo obtain supercritical co too, which is really cool thing. You know, they used supercritical sio tu tio decaffeinated coffee without, you know, adding a solvent that you'LL be able to taste, which is really cool. But no, you can't liquefy so two above thirty-one degrees Celsius or below five-point eleven atmospheric pressures anyway, that's how I answer this question. Hope this helped :)

5 0

2 years ago

Name 3 things that rainforest and deserts have in common

Arturiano [62]

Some similarities between deserts and rainforests are that they support complex ecosystems, are powered by the sun/photosynthetic plants, are dangerous/mostly uninhabitable for humans, due to both conditions and wildlife, and are found mostly in the tropics

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers