Answer:
<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.
On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.
Answer:
Omega Company
B) Product Y should be produced because it will produce greater total profit.
Explanation:
If only Product X is produced, the total profit it will produced is:
Selling price = $35
Variable Cost = $20
Contribution = $15
Total Contribution = $15 x 75,000/4 = $281,250
If only Product Y is produced, the total profit will be:
Selling price = $25
Variable cost = $15
Contribution = $10
Total Contribution = $10 x 75,000/2 = $375,000
Product Y therefore produces a greater total profit. This is because the fixed cost will remain the same if there are no avoidable elements.
Answer: a. Making authorized commitments
Explanation:
Executive Orders 12674 and 12731 (which amended 12674) of 1989 and 1990 respectively, were signed by President Bush with the purpose of setting forth the principles of ethical conduct that were required of Federal Government Officers and Employees.
These principles were meant to ensure that government officials and employees abstained from Abuse of power whilst working in such a way as not to bring disrepute to the Federal Government.
All of the above are violations of the Order except option A which is stated in Part I Section 101 (f) of Executive Order 12674. It reads that, "<em>Employees shall make no unauthorized statements</em>..." thus insinuating that employees are allowed to make Authorized statements.
Answer:
1. $13,500
2. $13,500
3. $336,500
Explanation:
1. Bad debt expense:
= Sales × Percent of sales uncollectible
= $900,000 × 1.5%
= $13,500
Therefore, the bad debt expense for the year 2019 is $13,500.
2. Allowance for Doubtful accounts = $13,500
3. For the end of 2019, what is the company's net realizable value:
= Accounts receivable - Allowance for Doubtful accounts
= $350,000 - $13,500
= $336,500
Answer:
To teach High School, you need a Bachelors degree.
To graduate it, you have to pass English/Language Arts · Mathematics · Science · Social Studies/History · Foreign Languages · Physical Education
