Answer:
Government spending would have to change by <u>$1.6 billion</u>
Explanation:
The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) refers to the proportion of an increase in aggregate income that is spent on consumption of commodities by a consumer.
Since from the question, we have:
MPC = Marginal propensity to consume = 0.75
The MPC can therefore be used to calculate the fiscal multiplier which measures the effect of government spending on real GDP as follows:
Fiscal multiplier = 1 / (1 - MPC) = 1 / (1 - 0.75) = 1 / 0.25 = 4.0
Therefore, we have:
Change in government spending = Fiscal multiplier * Amount of targeted increase real GDP = 4.0 * $400 million = $1.6 billion
Therefore, government spending would have to change by <u>$1.6 billion</u> to generate $400 million increase in real GDP.
Answer:
All of the above are true.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns was first formulated by the classic economist David Ricardo. It presupposes a technical relationship between input and output, which is not scientifically demonstrable but only empirically. In practice, in a generic production system, at any contribution of any factor, that is, land, labor, capital, machines, etc. there is no proportionally increasing production increase.
Normally it is assumed that the law does not always come into operation but only when the variable input exceeds a certain threshold. For example, the increase of workers on an assembly line certainly allows a proportional increase in production, but only until the entire system begins to suffer from malfunctions due to logistics or work organization, precisely because of the its getting bigger. Large industrial plants have shown that they must be divided into sections, however coordinated, precisely because of the decreasing returns. This is because the increase in the number of workers and the mass of the plants does not correspond to a consequent increase in production.
Answer: A. I and IV only
Explanation:
The relationship between bond prices and interest is an inverse one. This is because bonds have fixed rates so when for instance interest rates increase, the fixed rate of bonds will become less attractive as people would want to make the higher interest. They will therefore demand less of bonds and the prices will drop. The reverse is true.
Also, long term bonds are more affected by interest rate changes then short term bonds. This is because, as they have a longer term till maturity, they will be even less attractive when interest rates rise.
Answer: c. The new system contained assumptions that did not consider critical factors such as changes in time zones, travel time across hemispheres, and pilot flying hours
Explanation:
Upon review of the effectiveness of a strategic business decision using evidence-based analytics, business leaders may reverse course.
The factor that led to the reversal of the new scheduling system is that the new system contained assumptions that did not consider critical factors such as changes in time zones, travel time across hemispheres, and pilot flying hours.
