The answer to this that would most make sense is b. although i am not sure, that's what i'm laying most towards.
the given expression is,
![=3v^2-4v-7](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D3v%5E2-4v-7)
![\begin{gathered} =3v^2-7v+3v-7 \\ =v(3v-7)+1(3v-7) \end{gathered}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bgathered%7D%20%3D3v%5E2-7v%2B3v-7%20%5C%5C%20%3Dv%283v-7%29%2B1%283v-7%29%20%5Cend%7Bgathered%7D)
![=(3v-7)(v+1)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%283v-7%29%28v%2B1%29)
so the factors are (3v - 7) (v + 1)
the given equation is,
![=3v^2-4v-7](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D3v%5E2-4v-7)
so the answer is
(3v-7)(v+1)
Answer: it would result into a negative number since they are both negative, however if you imply real math rules it would result in positive five since the signs change when a negative and a negative becomes a positive
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
20%
Step-by-step explanation:
300 - 240 = 60 ÷ 300 = 20% mangoes.
Answer:
16%
Step-by-step explanation:
80/100x 20/1 = 1600/100 cut0 n d16%a