Answer:
1, 3
Explanation:
For an experiment comparing two treatment conditions, there will be one (1) score for each participant if a within-subjects design is used and there will be three (3) score(s) for each participant if a between-subjects design is used. If a between-subjects designed is used, one score is gathered for each of the subject. This score is then averaged with the scores of the other subjects in the other group (treatment group), and then these average scores of each group are compared to check for the effectiveness of one treatment over the other.
Answer:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
Explanation:
The Fourteenth Amendment, which granted citizenship and equal rights to African Americans took effect on July 28th, 1868. Although the Fourteenth Amendment was sent to Congress for ratification on June 16, 1866, it was not officially enforced until July 28th, 1868. The Fourteenth Amendment was a pivotal step in African American’s fight for civil rights. The groundbreaking amendment, most notably granted citizenship and equal rights to African American citizens, including former slaves.
The Fourteenth Amendment is broken into five sections, outlining the citizenship and rights granted to African Americans, the forbiddance and consequences for states that withhold basic liberties to African Americans, the new system for determining selectees for the House of Representatives after the nullification of the Thirteenth Amendment (three-fifths rule), and the national debt acquired during the Civil War.
Answer: 1) Supreme court always opposes anything that is against constitutio
2) They give judgment without favouritism
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has taken these particular stands in the court by rejecting the argument that presidents or executive officials could waive statutory policy, in this case the Neutrality Act of 1794. A president may not authorize a person to do what the law forbids
The overall opinion the Supreme Court believe about Presidential Power are:
the Supreme Court interpreted constitutional disputes between the two elected branches without favoring presidential power over Congress.
It also recognized that, when a presidential proclamation in time of war conflicts with congressional language expressed in a statute, the legislative position prevails
<span>Language could unite people and help them form their own country by allowing them to share similar thoughts, ideas, and goals. The common language would allow them to communicate easily to form laws and a governmental structure. In addition, it would enable easy formation of a military to guard the borders of the country from potential enemies.</span>
Answer:
carbon, compass, carnivore and clouds
Explanation: Hope this helps! Please give a thanks and maybe even brainliest!
