A regular hexagon can be dissected into six equilateral triangles by adding a center point
Answer Difference between the experimental and the theoretical probability is 2/5 . Step-by-step explanation: Spinner is spun 10 times, and experimental probability of landing on a 3 is 1/2, i.e. out of 10 times spinner lands 5 times into 3.
I hope it is helpful
REPOST IT A BIT CLEARER sorry i was on caps and im to lazy to elete what i wworte and repost it
the solid is made up of 2 regular octagons, 8 sides, joined up by 8 rectangles, one on each side towards the other octagonal face.
from the figure, we can see that the apothem is 5 for the octagons, and since each side is 3 cm long, the perimeter of one octagon is 3*8 = 24.
the standing up sides are simply rectangles of 8x3.
if we can just get the area of all those ten figures, and sum them up, that'd be the area of the solid.
![\bf \textit{area of a regular polygon}\\\\ A=\cfrac{1}{2}ap~~ \begin{cases} a=apothem\\ p=perimeter\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ a=5\\ p=24 \end{cases}\implies A=\cfrac{1}{2}(5)(24)\implies \stackrel{\textit{just for one octagon}}{A=60} \\\\[-0.35em] \rule{34em}{0.25pt}\\\\ \stackrel{\textit{two octagon's area}}{2(60)}~~+~~\stackrel{\textit{eight rectangle's area}}{8(3\cdot 8)}\implies 120+192\implies 312](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Barea%20of%20a%20regular%20polygon%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20A%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7Dap~~%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20a%3Dapothem%5C%5C%20p%3Dperimeter%5C%5C%5B-0.5em%5D%20%5Chrulefill%5C%5C%20a%3D5%5C%5C%20p%3D24%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20A%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%285%29%2824%29%5Cimplies%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bjust%20for%20one%20octagon%7D%7D%7BA%3D60%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20%5Crule%7B34em%7D%7B0.25pt%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Btwo%20octagon%27s%20area%7D%7D%7B2%2860%29%7D~~%2B~~%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Beight%20rectangle%27s%20area%7D%7D%7B8%283%5Ccdot%208%29%7D%5Cimplies%20120%2B192%5Cimplies%20312)
F(x) is a quadratic. The y intercept, therefore, is equal to the c value.
The y intercept here is -4.
For g(x), you can tell that the y intercept is 0 because that's the value of y when the x value is 0.
For h(x), the chart specifies that when x=0, y=-2, so the y intercept is -2.
Of these three values, 0 is the largest.
Final answer: g(x)
