Answer:
interchangeable parts and assembly lines
Explanation:
Answer:
acquisition
Merger
Explanation:
Acquisition is when a company purchases almost all the shares of another company in order to have full control over it. For companies that are distressed or are not able to operate as a going concern, such can put up the company for sale.
In acquisition, the buying company oftentimes retain its name which is already a brand , work and build on the strength of the old company in order to achieve returns. Companies acquire other companies in order to have large market shares and also to diversify their business operation.
One of the benefit of acquisition is that it gives room for fresh ideas due to coming together of different people and also brings people that are experts in their various fields.
Merger is when two or more firms comes together to form a single entity.
Companies or firm merge in order to form an alliance and also send strong signals to other competitors.
Firms also merge in order to increase their financial capacity. This will enable them to be able to finance their business operations. They are also able to increase their asset base as a result of the merger.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this statement is true. It is because a market segment's purpose is to have a group in which shares the same characteristics or goals because of marketing purpose. It could be seen in the scenario above in how they share the same characteristic in using the internet.
Answer:
2. (i) demand-side; (ii) both; (iii) supply-side; (iv) supply-side; (v) both
Explanation:
a. $1,000 per person tax reduction ⇒ focus on aggregate demand (more money for consumers to spend)
b. a 5% reduction in all tax rates ⇒ focus on both aggregate demand and supply (more money for consumers and suppliers)
c. Pell Grants, which are government subsidies for college education ⇒ focus on aggregate supply (more money for suppliers of college education)
d. government-sponsored prizes for new scientific discoveries ⇒ focus on aggregate supply (more money for suppliers of new scientific discoveries)
e. an increase in unemployment compensation ⇒ focus on both aggregate demand and supply (more money for consumers resulting in higher prices and lower output)
