Answer:
A). Was replaced by someone who is below the age of 40.
Explanation:
Prima Facie Case of discrimination(Title VII, Civil Rights Act, 1964) is elucidated as the case in which the petitioner possesses adequate evidence to validate his complaint or allegation and prove that he/she has been discriminated against by their employer. To make such a case, the plaintiff is required to present sufficient evidence to prove to the judge or convince him/her to deduce that the discrimination from the employer's end took place.
As per the question, to make a 'Prima facie case' against the employer Milford is required to not let disclosed or established that he 'was replaced by someone who is below the age of 40' as this would influence the credibility of his allegation and make the judge infer a decision against him(due to the age factor). Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
When it comes to emotionally charged memories, the amygdala is crucial to memory formation.
Because the amygdala is connected to and located close to the hippocampus, a brain structure involved in memory, the two frequently work together to improve memory recall. The thalamus serves a variety of purposes, but it is widely thought that it serves as a hub and information relay between several subcortical regions and the cerebral cortex. The thalamic nucleus, which is present in each sensory system, receives sensory impulses and sends them to the corresponding main cortical region. The amygdala is interconnected with many other brain areas, allowing it to communicate with areas that process "higher" cognitive information and systems that control "lower" processes (including fear, anger, and fear-related behaviors)
Learn more about amygdala here:
brainly.com/question/28206728
#SPJ4
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
The New Jersey plan proposed this.
They proposed this, because they wanted smaller states to have equal powers in the government with the larger states. The other plan proposed was the Virginia plan. They wanted the states to have votes proportional to the population. However, the small states didn't like this because they would have less power in the government.
Eventually, they decided on a compromise, with the Senate following the New Jersey plan of each state getting equal representation, and the House of Representatives following the Virginia plan of votes proportional to the population.
