1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darya [45]
3 years ago
10

How to find x in a triangle with only two known lengths

Mathematics
2 answers:
kow [346]3 years ago
8 0
A triangle is 180 degrees. X+first length+second length=180. Then solve
Sidana [21]3 years ago
7 0
The whole triangle equals 180 so take the other two lengths and subtract it from 180 and get the last length
You might be interested in
Dimetri says that a function that is made of terms where the variables is raised only to an odd power will be an odd function.Do
lana [24]

Here we want to study the relation between the exponents in a polynomial function and the "odd" property of functions.

We will see that Dimetri is correct.

-------------------------------

We start by defining an odd function as a function such that:

f(-x) = -f(x).

Now, let's see a simple function with only odd exponents.

f(x) = a*x  (the exponent is 1, so it is odd).

if we evaluate this in x = 1, we get:

f(1) = a

If we evaluate this in x = -1, we get:

f(-1) = a*-1 = -a

Then this is odd.

Now let's see a more general case and why Dimetri is correct.

For the rule of signs, when we multiply 2 negative numbers, the <u>product is positive.</u>

So always that we have an even exponent on a negative number, the outcome will be positive.

This does not happen for odd exponents, because we can't separate all the products in groups of 2, thus if we take the <u>odd exponent of a negative number, the outcome is negative</u>.

Then for functions with only odd exponents, the <u>outcome for evaluating the function in a given input is exactly the opposite of evaluating the same function with the opposite input</u>.

This means that the function is odd.

Again, note that this only happens if the function only has odd exponents.

If you want to learn more, you can read:

brainly.com/question/15775372

6 0
3 years ago
Work out 60 × 2/3 (2 over 3)
Taya2010 [7]
Solution:
60 x 2/3
60/1 x 2/3 
120/3
40 
Answer:
40

hope this helps!

3 0
3 years ago
Please help!posted picture of question
ale4655 [162]
We have the following arithmetic series:
 4, 13, 22, 31, 40
 The common difference is given by:
 13-4 = 9
 22-13 = 9
 31-22 = 9
 40-31 = 9
 Since it is an arithmetic series, the difference is constant.
 Answer:
 
The common difference is:
 
9
 
option 4
7 0
3 years ago
Prove that if n is a perfect square then n + 2 is not a perfect square
notka56 [123]

Answer:

This statement can be proven by contradiction for n \in \mathbb{N} (including the case where n = 0.)

\text{Let $n \in \mathbb{N}$ be a perfect square}.

\textbf{Case 1.} ~ \text{n = 0}:

\text{$n + 2 = 2$, which isn't a perfect square}.

\text{Claim verified for $n = 0$}.

\textbf{Case 2.} ~ \text{$n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $n \ne 0$. Hence $n \ge 1$}.

\text{Assume that $n$ is a perfect square}.

\text{$\iff$ $\exists$ $a \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t. $a^2 = n$}.

\text{Assume $\textit{by contradiction}$ that $(n + 2)$ is a perfect square}.

\text{$\iff$ $\exists$ $b \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t. $b^2 = n + 2$}.

\text{$n + 2 > n > 0$ $\implies$ $b = \sqrt{n + 2} > \sqrt{n} = a$}.

\text{$a,\, b \in \mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{Z}$ $\implies b - a = b + (- a) \in \mathbb{Z}$}.

\text{$b > a \implies b - a > 0$. Therefore, $b - a \ge 1$}.

\text{$\implies b \ge a + 1$}.

\text{$\implies n+ 2 = b^2 \ge (a + 1)^2= a^2 + 2\, a + 1 = n + 2\, a + 1$}.

\text{$\iff 1 \ge 2\,a $}.

\text{$\displaystyle \iff a \le \frac{1}{2}$}.

\text{Contradiction (with the assumption that $a \ge 1$)}.

\text{Hence the original claim is verified for $n \in \mathbb{N}\backslash\{0\}$}.

\text{Hence the claim is true for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$}.

Step-by-step explanation:

Assume that the natural number n \in \mathbb{N} is a perfect square. Then, (by the definition of perfect squares) there should exist a natural number a (a \in \mathbb{N}) such that a^2 = n.

Assume by contradiction that n + 2 is indeed a perfect square. Then there should exist another natural number b \in \mathbb{N} such that b^2 = (n + 2).

Note, that since (n + 2) > n \ge 0, \sqrt{n + 2} > \sqrt{n}. Since b = \sqrt{n + 2} while a = \sqrt{n}, one can conclude that b > a.

Keep in mind that both a and b are natural numbers. The minimum separation between two natural numbers is 1. In other words, if b > a, then it must be true that b \ge a + 1.

Take the square of both sides, and the inequality should still be true. (To do so, start by multiplying both sides by (a + 1) and use the fact that b \ge a + 1 to make the left-hand side b^2.)

b^2 \ge (a + 1)^2.

Expand the right-hand side using the binomial theorem:

(a + 1)^2 = a^2 + 2\,a + 1.

b^2 \ge a^2 + 2\,a + 1.

However, recall that it was assumed that a^2 = n and b^2 = n + 2. Therefore,

\underbrace{b^2}_{=n + 2)} \ge \underbrace{a^2}_{=n} + 2\,a + 1.

n + 2 \ge n + 2\, a + 1.

Subtract n + 1 from both sides of the inequality:

1 \ge 2\, a.

\displaystyle a \le \frac{1}{2} = 0.5.

Recall that a was assumed to be a natural number. In other words, a \ge 0 and a must be an integer. Hence, the only possible value of a would be 0.

Since a could be equal 0, there's not yet a valid contradiction. To produce the contradiction and complete the proof, it would be necessary to show that a = 0 just won't work as in the assumption.

If indeed a = 0, then n = a^2 = 0. n + 2 = 2, which isn't a perfect square. That contradicts the assumption that if n = 0 is a perfect square, n + 2 = 2 would be a perfect square. Hence, by contradiction, one can conclude that

\text{if $n$ is a perfect square, then $n + 2$ is not a perfect square.}.

Note that to produce a more well-rounded proof, it would likely be helpful to go back to the beginning of the proof, and show that n \ne 0. Then one can assume without loss of generality that n \ne 0. In that case, the fact that \displaystyle a \le \frac{1}{2} is good enough to count as a contradiction.

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone please answer. There is one problem. There's a picture. Thank you!
Over [174]
I believe the answer is A, 6,720.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The point at which the number lines intersect on the coordinate plane is the (origin, x-axis).
    6·1 answer
  • You invest 5000 in an account at 5.5% per year simple intrest how much will you have in the account at the beginning of the 6th
    5·1 answer
  • Can you please help me with this question
    11·1 answer
  • One batch of fruit salad has equal amount of which kinds of fruit? Explain how you decided
    5·1 answer
  • What are some key ways to solve math word problems? How can you tell which math category does a problem solving question fall in
    15·1 answer
  • 43 centimeters eauals what fraction of a meter
    12·2 answers
  • What does x mean in math
    13·2 answers
  • The cost of 3 scarves is $72.75. What is the unit price?
    15·1 answer
  • Write an equation for the line in slope- intercept form. 2. Х -4 -2 o 2 4. -2 4​
    7·1 answer
  • Help!! Will give brainliest
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!