90%. 9/10 is equivalent to 90/100 making the percentage 90%
<span>- The triangular patches have an area of 63 cm</span>² (A1= 63 cm²)<span>.
- The rectangular piece of fabric is 27 centimeters long and 21 centimeters wide.
1. Then, the first thing you must do is to calculate the area of the piece of fabric. The formula for the area of a rectangle is:
A2=LxW
L=27 centimeters (The lenght of the rectangle)
W=21 centimeters (The width of the rectangle)
2. When you substitute the values of L and W into the formula, you obtain:
A2=(27 cm)(21 cm)
A2=567 cm</span>²
<span>
3. Then, let's calculate how many triangular patches she can cut from a rectangular piece of fabric:
A2/A1= 567 cm</span>²/63 cm²= 9 triangular patches
4. Finally, you can calculate how many triangular patches she can cut from 33 rectangular pieces of the fabric:
(9 triangular patches)(33 pieces of fabric)=297 triangular patches
<span>
How many of the patches can Leia cut from 33 pieces of the fabric?
The answer is: 297 triangular patches</span>
Answer:
It is C because on 12 I can see 3.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
one tenth of a sandwich
Step-by-step explanation:
Sum/difference:
Let
This means that
Now, assume that 
is rational. The sum/difference of two rational numbers is still rational (so 5-x is rational), and the division by 3 doesn't change this. So, you have that the square root of 8 equals a rational number, which is false. The mistake must have been supposing that was rational, which proves that the sum/difference of the two given terms was irrational
Multiplication/division:
The logic is actually the same: if we multiply the two terms we get
if again we assume x to be rational, we have
But if x is rational, so is -x/15, and again we come to a contradiction: we have the square root of 8 on one side, which is irrational, and -x/15 on the other, which is rational. So, again, x must have been irrational. You can prove the same claim for the division in a totally similar fashion.
