1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad1618 [11]
3 years ago
13

What is the results when the following are subjected to the feeling’s test and why?

Chemistry
2 answers:
Roman55 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

B, C, D, and E give positive tests.

Explanation:

Fehling's test is a test for reducing sugars, i.e., those that have a hemiacetal or potential aldehyde group (Fig. 1)

If the test is positive, a deep blue solution of complexed copper(II) ion is converted to a brick-fed precipitate of copper(I) oxide.

The equation for the reaction is

\rm\underbrace{\hbox{RCHO}}_{\hbox{aldehyde}} +\underbrace{\hbox{2Cu^{2+}}}_{\hbox{deep blue}} + 5OH^{-} \longrightarrow \, RCOO^{-} +\underbrace{\hbox{Cu_{2}\text{O}}}_{\hbox{brick-red ppt}} + 3H$_{2}$O

Positive Tests

Lactose (Fig. 2) is a disaccharide of galactose and glucose. It is a reducing sugar because it has a hemiacetal unit, indicated by the red arrow.

Maltose (Fig.3) is a disaccharide of glucose. It is a reducing sugar because it has a hemiacetal unit, indicated by the red arrow.

Fructose (Fig. 4) is a ketose, but it tautomerizes in basic media to aldoses glucose and mannose. thus, it gives a positive Fehling's test.

Glucose (Fig. 1) gives a positive test, because it has a potential aldehyde group.

Negative tests

Sucrose (Fig. 5) is a disaccharide of glucose and fructose. It is not a reducing sugar, because it lacks a hemiacetal group. It has only acetal groups (blue arrows).

frosja888 [35]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

See below.

Explanation:

Sucrose - negative because this is not a reducing sugar.

Lactose, Maltose, Fructose and Glucose - positive as they are reducing sugars..

Reducing sugars have a free aldehyde or ketone group   whereas non-reducing sugars do not.

You might be interested in
Did I get these correctly?
Luda [366]
Those are both correct! great job, keep up the good work (-:
4 0
3 years ago
What is the specific heat of a substance if a mass of 10.0 kg increases in temperature from 10.0°C to 70.0°C when 2,520 J of hea
SCORPION-xisa [38]
Heat energy can be calculated by using the specific heat of a substance multiplying it to the mass of the sample and the change in temperature. It is expressed as: 
Energy = mCΔT2520= 10.0(C) (70.0 - 10.0)C = 4.2 J/ kg K
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the following half-reactions to write three spontaneous reactions, calculate E°cell for each reaction, and rank the oxidizin
Ainat [17]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1)

we know that

half cell with higher reduction potential is cathode

so

cathode :

N20 + 2H+ + 2e- ---> N2 + H20

anode :

Cr(s) ---> Cr+3 + 3e-

so

overall reaction is

3 N20 + 6H+ + 2 Cr ---> 3N2 + 3H20 + 2Cr+3

now

Eo cell = Eo cathode - Eo anode

so

EO cell = 1.77 + 0.74

Eo cell = 2.51 V

now

in this case

oxidizing agents are N20 and Cr+3

reducing agents are Cr and N2

higher the reduction potential , stronger the oxidizing agent

lower the reduction potential , stronger the reducing agent

so

oxidzing agents

N20 > Cr+3

reducing agents

Cr > N2

2)

cathode :

Au+ + e- --> Au

anode :

Cr ---> Cr+3 + 3e-

overall reaction

3Au+ + Cr ---> 3Au + Cr+3

Eo cell = 1.69 + 0.74

Eo cell = 2.43

now

oxidizing agents :

Au+ > Cr+3

reducing agents :

Cr > Au

3)

cathode :

N20 + 2H+ + 2e- ---> N2 + H20

andoe :

Au ---> Au+ + e-

overall

2 Au + N20 + 2H+ --> 2 Au+ + N2 + H20

Eo cell = 1.77 - 1.69

Eo cell = 0.08

oxidizing agents

N20 > Au+

reducing agents

Au > N2

8 0
3 years ago
List all wether
nignag [31]

Explanation:

Agricultural productivity is dependent on Co2, Temperature, Solar Radiation, Precipitation, Soil Moisture and Wind Direction. Changes in any or all of these elements has a direct impact on the crop production.

7 0
3 years ago
Which possible discovery would be attributed to an inorganic molecule?
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

fireproofing spray used in firefighting can be termed as one of the possible discovery that would be attributed to an inorganic molecule.

Explanation: • There a number of advancement been made each day to improve the different process either domestic, industrial, or related to research work. As a number of professionals are always in search to get the right set of information or data to get to a more proper conclusion.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Volume increases, pressure stays the same, temperature
    14·1 answer
  • If the distillation is performed in full as described in the experimental procedure (including the redistillations of fractions
    11·1 answer
  • Help please help help
    14·1 answer
  • Why does a salt compound give off light (or a colored flame) when burned? 4. did lithium chloride and sodium chloride give off s
    11·2 answers
  • A student finds two unlabeled flasks of clear liquids. One is believed to be 0.1 m nacl and the other to be 0.1 m naclo3. What i
    6·1 answer
  • What is mostly made out of rock and metal with no gas or dust?
    8·1 answer
  • Over the years, the thermite reaction has been used for welding railroad rails, in incendiary bombs, and to ignite solid fuel ro
    14·1 answer
  • If you have 8.00 grams of Dinitrogen tetraoxide and 4.00 grams of Hydrazine, How many grams of Nitrogen will form?
    13·1 answer
  • In what way is Model A better than Model B? Model A shows the types of elements in the compound, but Model B does not. Model A s
    6·2 answers
  • Help i know whofkfkfkf
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!