<span>Step 1:
Females who attend college = 0.80 * 0.90 = 0.72
Step 2:
Females who did not attend college = 0.80 * 0.10 = 0.08
Step 3
Male who attend College 0.20 * 0.78 = 0.156
Step 4
Male who did not attend college 0.20 * 0.22 = 0.044
So 0.044(4.4%) is the probability that the person selected is a male who did not attend college</span>
Answer:
Central
Explanation:
If a television commercial for a new car carefully analyzes the car's features and price, relative to other available models. The advertiser is attempting to follow the central route to persuasion.
A central route to persuasion can be defined as the thoughtful consideration of an arguments, either content or ideas in a message.
In this scenario, the television company in its commercials used facts and data (car features and price) to actively convince potential customers of the car's worthiness relative to other available models. Therefore, the argument here is strong and is focused on the quality of the car.
Answer: Yes, because the helicopter manufacturer assumed the risk of the failure of the contract.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario given in the question, the subcontractor will likely prevail because the helicopter manufacturer assumed the risk of the failure of the contract.
Here, when the helicopter manufacturer entered into the contract with the subcontractor, the manufacturer was aware that the helicopters will be used in the "severely war-torn region.
In this case, the subcontractor wasn't aware of the information that the manufacturer knew of and therefore wasn't able to determine the risk that was involved in the contract.
Answer: price behavior that differs from the behavior predicted by the efficient market hypothesis
Explanation: In simple words, market anomaly refers to the difference in the price of the securities that occurs due to the variable factors that were not considered appropriately in the efficient market hypothesis.
The environment of market is very dynamic and there are certain variables that could not be predicted completely. Hence the prices of securities differes from hypothesis in actual.
Answer:
Explanation:
Number of completed barrels = 216 + (244-216)*60%
= 233 barrels
Cost per barrel = (3245+3230)/233 = 27.8
Cost of oil shipped in pipeline = 216 * 27.8= 6003 millions
Cost of work in process ending inventory = (244-216)*60% * 27.8
= 467.04 million
