The events are independent. By definition, it means that knowledge about one event does not help you predict the second, and this is the case: even if you knew that you rolled an even number on the first cube, would you be more or less confident about rolling a six on the second? No.
An example in which two events about rolling cubes are dependent could be something like:
Event A: You roll the first cube
Event B: The second cube returns a higher number than the first one.
In this case, knowledge on event A does change you view on event B (and vice versa): if you know that you rolled a 6 on the first cube you don't want to bet on event B, while if you know that you rolled a 1 on the first cube, you're certain that event B will happen.
Conversely, if you know that event B has happened, you are more likely to think that the first cube rolled a small number, and vice versa.
<span>£1 equals to 1.43 us dollars.
7 </span>× 1.43 = <span>10.01
</span>10.01 ÷ 5 = <span>2.002
</span>
2 fives are equal to <span>£7. </span>
It should be E) none of the above because:
height = 0.5
Radius = 1
diameter = 2
