Answer:
what whats the question so I can answer
Answer: There is not a good prediction for the height of the tree when it is 100 years old because the prediction given by the trend line produced by the regression calculator probably is not valid that far in the future.
Step-by-step explanation:
Years since tree was planted (x) - - - - height (y)
2 - - - - 17
3 - - - - 25
5 - - - 42
6 - - - - 47
7 - - - 54
9 - - - 69
Using a regression calculator :
The height of tree can be modeled by the equation : ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
With y being the predicted variable; 7.36 being the slope and 3.08 as the intercept.
X is the independent variable which is used in calculating the value of y.
Predicted height when years since tree was planted(x) = 100
ŷ = 7.36X + 3.08
ŷ = 7.36(100) + 3.08
y = 736 + 3.08
y = 739.08
Forward prediction of 100 years produced by the trendline would probably give an invalid value because the trendline only models a range of 9 years prediction. However, a linear regression equation isn't the best for making prediction that far in into the future.
1) (f + g)(2) = 7 + 3 = 10 The answer is C
2) (f - g)(4) = 11 - 15 = -4 The answer is A
3) f(1) = 2(1) + 3 = 5 g(1) = 1² - 1 = 0 The answer is D
4) (f xg ) (1) = 7/3 The answer is B
Answer:
send the graph and ill solve it
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
[text] x = p(m - n) [/tex]
Or
[text] x = pm - pn [/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
[text] m = n + \frac{x}{p} [/tex]
Required:
Make x the subject of the formula
Solution:
What we are required to do is to rewrite the equation so that x will be alone on one side while the other variables will be on the other side.
[text] m = n + \frac{x}{p} [/tex]
Subtract n from each side
[text] m - n = n + \frac{x}{p} - n [/tex]
[text] m - n = \frac{x}{p} [/tex]
Multiply both sides by p
[text] p(m - n) = \frac{x}{p}*p [/tex]
[text] p(m - n) = x [/tex]
[text] x = p(m - n) [/tex]
Or
[text] x = pm - pn [/tex]
