Answer:
200000 J
Explanation:
From the question given above, the following data were obtained:
Mass (m) of roller coaster = 1000 Kg
Velocity (v) of roller coaster = 20 m/s
Kinetic energy (KE) =?
Kinetic energy is simply defined as the energy possess by an object in motion. Mathematically, it can be expressed as:
KE = ½mv²
Where
KE => is the kinetic energy.
m =>is the mass of the object
V => it the velocity of the object.
With the above formula, we can obtain the kinetic energy of the roller coaster as follow:
Mass (m) of roller coaster = 1000 Kg
Velocity (v) of roller coaster = 20 m/s
Kinetic energy (KE) =?
KE = ½mv²
KE = ½ × 1000 × 20²
KE = 500 × 400
KE = 200000 J
Therefore, the kinetic energy of the roller coaster is 200000 J.
<span>
accept the flow of electrons.resist the flow of electrons.accept the flow of protons.resist the flow of protons.It is one of these </span>
The Ozone layer is responsible for the absorption of harmful
radiation from the sun before it hits the surface or exterior structure of our
planet. It is known to be a belt of a known occurring gas, known as “ozone”
which is sealed around the Earth’s atmosphere. It serves as a shield, which absorbs
most of the sun’s ultraviolet radiation.
Answer:
c. turn downward
Explanation:
From the information given:
To find the tendency of the sander;
We need to apply the right-hand rule torque; whereby we consider the direction of the flywheel, the direction at which the torque is acting, and the movement of the sander toward the right.
Since the flywheel of the sander is in counterclockwise movement, hence the torque direction will be outward placing on the wall. However, provided that the movement of the sander is toward the right, then there exists an opposite force that turns downward which showcases the tendency in the sander is downward.
Answer:
I do not think that it is the most reliable way to gain information since it is very hard to do and can be easily messed up. No, I don't think you can charge someone on only evidence from blood spatter, but if there was additional evidence I think that this would definitely help with the case but not on its own, since it doesn’t give you physical evidence about the suspect.
Explanation: