Answer: Innovators
Explanation:
Innovators are customers who take risk, seek changes and are also the earliest to purchase a new product. They are able to tolerate high risk which enables them to try products in the initial stage of its life cycle ahead of other customers.
Their tolerance for high risk makes them try out new products such as new technologies even though the product may fail eventually. They have huge financial liquidity which enables them try new products. They are also called influencers because they influence other people in the society about the product.
<u>Answer: </u>Consult
<u>Explanation:</u>
RICA is the acronym for Responsibility, Inform, Consult and Accountability. For different projects different categories are provided based on their requirement of involvement in the project. In the new project the IT department in the company provides inputs such as new software application. This work falls under consult in RICA matrix.
Responsibility is based on completion of the given work. Accountability to provide a final answer for the work done. Consult is providing feedback and contribution to the activity. Inform to person who requires information update.
The kind of startup that her store is considered to be is a new market idea. New market ideas are techniques or ideas that are employed or thought of as a way of strategizing and a way of improving one's business or store. In which Consuela engages to as she decided to have a new idea for a way of improving her store and for the sake of her customers.
A Shareholder is the partial owner of the company who purchases and owns share of stocks in a company.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
