The only one that I can do without google is 47. Sorry that I can't answer the others. The answer to 47 is this: you know that the western side of the hill has the steepest slope because the ovals showing altitude are way closer together. The closer the circles/ovals are, the steeper the slope is.
Sorry if this doesn't help much, but I answered what I could without cheating.
Foxeslair
Answer:Butane > ethane > methane, because between bigger molecules there are stronger van der Waals forces and also higher molar mass means they need to be given more energy to have enough kinetic energy to move quickly, freely in gas.
There are multiple butene isomers (Butene) and some (2-Butenes - cis and trans) actually have higher boiling point than n-Butane (there is also Isobutane, of course, with quite much lower boiling point than all of them) and some (1-Butene, Isobutylene) have lower, so this isn't really a fair or simple question. But on simplest level, it can again be said that 1-butene has lower boiling point because it has very similar shape but slightly lower molar mass (2H less) than n-butane.
Explanation:
Answer:
28.43 min
Explanation:
Using integrated rate law for first order kinetics as:
![[A_t]=[A_0]e^{-kt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BA_t%5D%3D%5BA_0%5De%5E%7B-kt%7D)
Where,
![[A_t]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BA_t%5D)
is the concentration at time t
![[A_0]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BA_0%5D)
is the initial concentration
Given that:
The rate constant, k = 
min⁻¹
Initial concentration = 0.1 M
Final concentration = 
M
Time = ?
Applying in the above equation, we get that:-
<span><span>There is no formula. The speed of light is a fundamental constant which appears in other formulas but there’s no formula to compute the numerical value.Well, actually, that’s not quite right. The numerical value in meters per second is known exactly, because we use the speed of light to define the meter. It is: <span><span><span>c=299,792,458 m/s</span><span>c=299,792,458 m/s</span></span>
</span>. Exactly. But the thing is — this value is purely an artifact of our unit system. Other unit systems will give other values, so the number value is entirely arbitrary.</span></span>
Answer & Explenation:
2H2 + O2 -> 2H20 is the balanced equation for the reaction of Hydrogen with Oxygen to form water so
If you have 32g of O2 this is a simple Dimensional analysis problem
32g O2 x 36.03056g H20/31.9988g O2 this way the O2 cancels out and you are left with just the H2O so your raw answer would be 36.0319112, then if your instructor requires a significant figure answer that would be to 2 significant figures the information you were given 32g O2, so as above 36g or Water are produced. Just a different way to view and solve the problem with the balanced equation so you can see the way everything relates to everything else. the molar masses of O2 and H2O are simply found my adding up 2 Oxygens 15.9994g x2 = 31.9988g and H2O = 2(1.00794) + 15.9994 = 18.01258 but you then have to multiply that by 2 because the reaction states you get 2 mols in the reaction so that is where I came up with the 36.03056g for the solution. Hope this helps. Dimensional Analysis is and can be one of the best ways to solve these problems, because not always are you going to be dealing with 1:2 ratios.
