Let's solve your inequality step-by-step.
<span><span><span>
a − 8 </span>+ 15 </span>> <span>23
</span></span>Step 1: Simplify both sides of the inequality.
<span><span><span><span><span>
−1/</span>8</span>a </span>+ 15 </span>> 23
</span>
Step 2: Subtract 15 from both sides.
<span><span><span><span><span><span>
−1/</span>8</span>a </span>+ 15 </span>− 15 </span>> <span>23 − 15
</span></span><span><span><span><span>
−1/</span>8</span>a </span>> 8
</span>
Step 3: Multiply both sides by 8/(-1).
<span><span><span>
(<span>8/<span>−1</span></span>) </span>* <span>(<span><span><span>−1/</span>8</span>a</span>) </span></span>> <span><span>(<span>8/<span>−1</span></span>) </span>* <span>(8)
</span></span></span><span>
a < <span>−<span>64
Therefore, the answer is a < -64! I hope this helped! :)</span></span></span>
Answer:
192 cm^3/min
Step-by-step explanation:
Differentiating the volume expression, we get ...
dV/dt = 2xh(dx/dt) +x^2(dh/dt)
We are given that ...
x = 4 cm, dx/dt = 2 cm/min, h = 15 cm, dh/dt = -3 cm/min
Putting these values into the formula for volume rate of change, we get ...
dV/dt = 2(4 cm)(15 cm)(2 cm/min) +(4 cm)^2(-3 cm/min)
= 240 cm^3/min -48 cm^3/min
dV/dt = 192 cm^3/min
SOLUTION:
Case: Hypothesis testing
Step 1: Null and Alternative hypotheses

Step 2: T-test analysis

Step 3: t-test with the significance level

Step 4: Comparing

So tail to reject the null hypothesis. There is enough evidence at a 0.05 level of significance to claim that the mean spent is greater than P127.50.
Final answer:
Yes, there is evidence sufficient to conclude that the mean amount spent is greater than P127.50 per month at a 0.05 level of significance.
45.
12/18 = 8/x <=> 2/3 = 8/x <=> x = (3*8)/2 = 12;
Answer: x=-14
Step-by-step explanation: