The two scholars contended that human behavior is not consistent as laymen and professional psychologists views it. They argued that research shows that behavior is not consistent. This inconsistency according to them is consistent and therefore can be used to predict human behavior.
Answer:
Cognitive psychology
Explanation:
Cognitive psychology covers not only intelligence and poblem solving but also perception, attention, memory, knowledge, reasoning, decision-making and language. It basically covers all related to thinking and therefore can explain functions that behaviorists cannot since behavioism is only concerned with the behavior that can be observed.
Answer:
i'd go with due process
Explanation:
The reason for this is that an impartial hearing doesn't have much to do with lifetime employment, free consent, or freedom of conscience. Then from privacy and due process, we can see that due process makes more sense because if their rights are being violated and they have an impartial hearing, this doesn't necessarily represent privacy (:
Answer:
1. As prescribed in the US Constitution American presidents are elected not directly by the people but by the people's electors. the electoral college was created by the framers of the US Constitution as an alternative to electing the president by popular vote or by Congress.
2. less people vote since the Constitution was made since it is not required by law to vote and is a right and a privilege.
3. yes because an electoral system or voting system is a set of rules that determines how electionsare conducted and how the results are determined.
Explanation:
Hope this helped Mark BRAINLEST please!!!
