Answer: D
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.
We try to factor by maybe grouping
experiment
(x²y³-11x²y)+(6y²-66)
factor
x²y(y²-11)+6(y²-11)
undistribute (y²-11) from each
(x²y+6)(y²-11)
we can force a factor out of the 2nd group in the form of a difference of 2 perfect squares
(x²y+6)(y-√11)(y+√11)
either of those 3 are factors
Assume that 100% = 45 sales and 35% = X sales amount
You can create a ratio to help you solve for x
45 = 100%
x = 35 %
Which is equal to this fraction: (45/x) = (100/35)
Solving for X by cross multiplying and dividing by 100:
[(45)(35)] / 100 = X = 15.75 = 16 sales (rounded up)
You would need at least 16 sales to increase sales total by 35%
The exponential function with a base greater than 1 is
14(1.95)^x
