Assume there is a smallest rational integer that has the following form: a/b
Then observe that we can define a/(b+1), which is strictly less than a/b because its divisor is bigger and is rational because it is the product of two numbers. Due to the contradiction created by our original claims that a/b is the smallest rational number that is possible, we might conclude that there is no such thing as the smallest rational number.
There can therefore be no smallest rational number because we may always define a smaller rational number than the one we now possess.
<h3>What is Rational number ?</h3>
Any number that can be expressed as a ratio is considered reasonable. It is therefore possible to represent it as a fraction when the numerator and denominator are both full numbers.
Learn more about Rational number here:
brainly.com/question/12088221
#SPJ4
Answer:
force and surface area are two factors affecting pressure on solids
more the force you apply, more will be the pressure
pressure and force are directly proportional meaning if Force is greater, pressure will also be greater
more the surface area of the solid less will be the pressure
surface area and pressure are inversely proportional meaning if surface are is big, pressure will be less, surface area small, pressure will be greater
Answer:
10⁻¹² W / m²
Explanation:
The feeble sound that a man can hear is of the vale which measures 0 on decibel scale . The intensity of sound in terms of J / m² .s is 10⁻¹² W / m² .
So the intensity of sound of monkey at 2.5 km must be 10⁻¹² W / m² .
Elementary charge used to determine charges of other objects is equal to a charge of electron or proton. It's value is roughly
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6242/a6242d8302ddac08820e47287682cce4909e40ed" alt="1.6* 10^{-19} C"
. All other charges are whole-number multipliers of this elementary charge, meaning that we multiply elementary charge by {...,-2,-1,0,1,2,...}.
To find out if the measured charge can be accepted we need to divide it with elementary charge to see if we get whole number as result.
There are three possible values of measured charge:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/520b0/520b0b9ba16dfab83206966ee4500cd0ee2c029d" alt="8.7* 10^{-19} C\\ 8.8* 10^{-19} C \\ 8.9* 10^{-19} C"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f1f8/8f1f8a1a9efd6ac3589f81a606ef27cc29282b6d" alt="N_{1} = \frac{8.7* 10^{-19} C }{1.6* 10^{-19} C } =5.44 \\ N_{2} = \frac{8.8* 10^{-19} C }{1.6* 10^{-19} C } =5.5 \\ N_{3} = \frac{8.9* 10^{-19} C }{1.6* 10^{-19} C } =5.56"
As we can see none of the possible values of a measured charge is whole-number multiplier of elementary charge so the researcher should not accept the value.
This charge can be achieved by using quarks which have value of 1/3 of elementary charge but they do not remain stable for long enough.