Answer:Slippery Slope fallacies
Explanation:
Slippery Slope: a slippery slope is based on rejecting a series of action without sufficient evidence or with no evidence that they will cause a series of unfortunate or undesirable ends.
So one accepts before something happens that particular actions or situations are bound to create a very prolematic future. One accepts that the future is doomed without even evidence that these recent series of action will bring that.
"The more people that come here, the more our government will have to provide for them. The more our government doles out, the further in debt our nation will become, and this means the higher our taxes will become! The next thing we will find is that our economy will be in just as poor a condition as the one from which these immigrants came! These are the events that has not been fully proven but there at assumptions that as they are listed they may cause a very negative outcome.
Answer:
In a group of city-states, each city-state is independent and rules by its own king. No central power controlled all of the city-states. In an empire, consisting of a nation and the city-states and nations it has conquered, one ruler is in control.
Explanation:
Based on the socio-cultural analysis, the source of <u>traditional authority</u> is personal as a ruler inherits authority based on long-standing customs.
This is because <u>traditional authority</u> is a form of authority established in the tradition or custom of a particular entity, place or company.
Traditional authority usually takes hereditary forms or is based on the long age established standards.
An example of Traditional authority is the Queen of England.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Traditional authority."</u>
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13579552
