Peer-to-peer is good for fast payment but is lacking in the transfer of funds security as there is mostly made b/w people with one unknown history or background, most people meeting for the first time, Compared to cash or check which is handled physically. This is further explained below.
<h3>Looking at the repayment time of peer-to-peer users how would you assume it compares to that every payment via cash or check?</h3>
Generally, P2P, which stands for peer-to-peer, is a method of payment that enables users to make purchases without needing to have access to their financial institution's account information. The transfer is completed quickly and, in most cases, at no cost. There is a generational divide in terms of adoption, but the vast majority of Americans today make use of mobile payment applications.
In conclusion, Peer-to-peer transactions are typically conducted between people who do not know each other's histories or backgrounds, and the majority of transactions involve people who are meeting for the first time. This makes peer-to-peer transactions less secure than cash or checks, which are physically handled. Peer-to-peer transactions are useful for making payments quickly.
Read more about Peer-to-peer
brainly.com/question/10571780
#SPJ1
Step-by-step explanation:
yes
Answer: 113.1 i think sorry im bad at pi U_U
Step-by-step explanation:
First let's find out the total number of strikeouts, by adding the number of strikeouts of each person:
Now, to find the percentage of strikeouts that Samar is responsible, let's divide his number of strikeouts (5) by the total number of strikeouts (50):
So Samar is responsible for 10% of the strikeouts.
Answer:
C.
3 units to the right would mean you are adding the positive value of 3 to the number 5
