19.72
9.50
+ 35.00
$ 64.22 total outstanding checks
Answer:
Supplier's quotation (2,400 x $6.25) 150,000
Less: Relevant cost of production:
Direct material (2,400 x $31) 74,400
Direct labour (2,400 x $18) 43,200
Variable overhead (2,400 x $9) <u>21,600</u> <u>139,200</u>
Savings <u> 10,800</u>
The parts should be produced in-house since the relevant cost of production is lower than supplier's quotation.
Explanation:
In this case, we need to compare supplier's quotation to the relevant cost of production. The price of $6.25 above was computed by dividing the total price charged by the supplier by the number of parts. Moreso, the relevant cost of production is obtained by the aggregate of direct material, direct labour and variable overhead.
Answer:
Hanna is correct.
Explanation:
The sale of the 2004 Dodge cannot be construed to be a sale of goods under the Uniform Commercial Code since this law covers sales of goods by merchants. Hanna cannot be said to be a merchant of 2004 Dodge as she is not known to be in the business for the purchase and sale of cars. Therefore, the case should be adjudicated under the common law. What has taken place in this instance is the exchange of a personal asset. Hanna cannot make a trading profit from the sale, but a capital gain. Rachel is not correct.
I think the answer is c.capitalize on interest but i'm not quite sure