All categories

3 years ago

Is the function represented by the table linear?

Mathematics

2 answers:

sergeinik [125]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The answer is " D". No, because it doesn't have a constant rate of change.

Step-by-step explanation:

To get -6 to 1, it takes 7 steps. But when you take 1 to 6, there are only 6 steps so it's not linear.

Correct me if I'm wrong!

Thank you

Tisa B Sora

Alborosie3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If you plot the numbers on a graph and use a ruler you can see, that they are not straight, they may look straight but they are not.

You might be interested in

Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. The possible values of x in the equation x^2-3/4 x=-1/4 are blank ± blank .

zlopas [31]

Answer:

x = 3/8 +/- i(√5)/8.

Step-by-step explanation:

I can't see any list by this is the solution of the equation:

x^2 - 3/4x = -1/4

x^2 - 3/4 x + 1/4 = 0

Multiply by 4 to remove the fractions:

4x^2 - 3x + 1 = 0

x = [-(-3) +/- sqrt(3)^2 - 4*4*1)] / 8

x = 3/8 +/-√ (-5) / 8

x = 3/8 +/- √5 i / 8

8 0

3 years ago

Wich of the followings ratios are equivalent to 8:6 4:3 select all that apply 6:8 16 :12 10:8 7:5

RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

16 :12

Step-by-step explain

You can right this as a fraction like 8/6 and if you multiply both the denominator and numerator by 2 you will get 16:12

7 0

3 years ago

Which equation is the inverse of y = x2 + 16?<br> 0 y=x²-16<br> y=i -16<br> y=+-16<br> y = x2 - 4

denpristay [2]

Answer:

y = ±√(x-16)

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the inverse of an equation, swap the x- and y-variables:

y = x² + 16

x = y² + 16

Then, solve for the y-variable:

x = y² + 16

y² = x - 16

y = ±√(x-16)

8 0

3 years ago

What is 3/7 - 2/7 this is unlike factors

stiks02 [169]

Answer:

$\frac{1}{7}$

Step-by-step explanation:

Since they have the same denominator (the number on the bottom), you can just subtract the numerators (the numbers on the top). So 3-2 is 1. You always leave the denominator as it is, don't subtract it.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Fiona was playing a game in which she rolled two number cubes. Cube #1 had the integers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 on its faces. Cube #

Gnom [1K]

When Fiona rolled Cube #2, she got a number -2 as she got 2 while rolling Cube #1 and the sum of the value on the cubes was 0.

As we know Cube #1 has integers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 on its faces and Cube #2 has -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6 on its faces.

It is also given that Fiona got 2 when she rolled cube #1 and the value of the sum on both the cubes is 0.

So it is clear that on Cube #2, the number must be -2 as in that case only, the sum of the values will be 0.

To prove

2 + (-1) = 1

2 + (-2) = 0

2 + (-3) = -1

Hence, the number she got on Cube #2 is -2.

To learn more about number here

brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago