1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Feliz [49]
3 years ago
8

Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]3 years ago
5 0
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
You might be interested in
What is 4 6/8+11 1/3
aivan3 [116]
So 4 6/8= (32/4)+6/8=38/8
11 1/3=(33/3)+1/3=34/3
so 38/8+(34/3)

to add you must get the bottom number equall so

114/24+272/24=386/24=16 1/12
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Simplify 8^x/4^y x 2^z
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

The answer is 8x.

Step-by-step explanation:

It is 8x.

EXCEPT,

Is it 2^{z} or 2^{2}

If it is 2^{z} then the answer is \frac{2^{3x+z} }{4}

PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST

4 0
2 years ago
YOOOOOOOO I FINALLY WAS ABLE TO GET REGISTERED
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

Ty for the free points lol

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pick correct graph from multiple choice options. A. C. B. D.
irina1246 [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

x = 2 is the equation of a vertical line passing through x = 2.  This is shown in the lower left graph:  a solid vertical line 2 units to the right of the y-axis.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help with these! Thanks!!
spin [16.1K]
-2[9 - (x + 7)]
-2[9 - x - 7]
-2[-x + 9 - 7]
-2[-x + 2]
-2[-x] - 2[2]
2x - 4

The answer is C.
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Figure ABCD is a rhombus with point A (3, −1). What rule would rotate the figure 270° counterclockwise?
    6·2 answers
  • Simplify the following expression.<br> 938 + (-158)
    9·2 answers
  • What is an example of when you might need to use decimals and other rational numbers in everyday life?
    10·1 answer
  • How do you do this?​
    5·2 answers
  • What is the x-intercept and the Y-intercept?<br><br> Y=-2/3x
    10·2 answers
  • A pack of confectioneries contains candies in four (4) flavors (berry, lemon, orange and cacao), 3 pieces each. Candies are dist
    15·1 answer
  • Please read below. Thank you.
    12·2 answers
  • Which fraction is equivalent to 5 Over 20?
    12·1 answer
  • Sarah decides to shop online at Hudson's Bay for some items. She buys a set of skis for $75.99, a pair of ski gloves for $25.00,
    12·1 answer
  • Please help, I need this quickly. It's an easy trigonometric question.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!