1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Feliz [49]
3 years ago
8

Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]3 years ago
5 0
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
You might be interested in
How many eggs will be needed to make 120 biscuits?​
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

i think hundred

if this is right so mark me brainliest

3 0
3 years ago
Find the indicated term of the geometric sequence. a8 for 4, -12, 36, ...
irina [24]

Answer:

76

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Factor the polynomial<br> 16z2 + 25
den301095 [7]

16z^2 + 25

This polynomial is already in lowest terms.

Answer: Cannot be factored.

This happens with certain polynomials.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A cashier at a store has five dollars in $20 bills if there are six times as many five dollar bills as $20 bills and the total m
erastovalidia [21]
X = $20 bills
6x = $5 bills

x(20) + 6x(5) = 1450
20x + 30x = 1450
50x = 1450
x = 29
6(29)= 174
3 0
3 years ago
The diagonals of a rhombus are 12 in. and 16 in. long. The length of a side of the rhombus is 10 in. What is the height of the r
iris [78.8K]
If d₁ and d₂ are the lengths of the diagonals, the area is given by
.. A = (1/2)*d₁*d₂
.. A = (1/2)*(12 in)*(16 in)
.. A = 96 in²

If b is the base and h is the height, the area is given by
.. A = b*h
We know the values of A and b, so
.. 96 in² = (10 in)*h
.. (96 in²)/(10 in) = h = 9.6 in

The height is 9.6 in.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the measure of ∠W, rounded to the nearest degree?
    10·2 answers
  • Question 3 (1 point)
    12·2 answers
  • For the function f(x)=x+9/7-4x find f^-1(x)
    15·1 answer
  • Find the equation of the line shown
    8·2 answers
  • You’re making 40 servings of English custard. Each serving is 250 ml. The following recipe yields 2 L.
    11·1 answer
  • Determine the domain and the range for this relationship. Drag the tiles to the correct locations on the image. Not all tiles wi
    14·1 answer
  • 10 points of 15% salt saluting are mixed with 15 points of 10% salt. What is the concentration of saluting?+
    11·1 answer
  • Help pleaseeeeeeeeee
    7·1 answer
  • Compare the graph of a linear inequality in two variables with the graph of a linear equation in two variables
    13·1 answer
  • A sphere has a radius that is 9 inches long. What is the volume of the sphere?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!