Cause weak ones aren't that strong and can easily break, but a strong connection will last longer and will be harder to break. For example you need to build a connection with your dog or else your dog wont trust you. Basically building a strong connection always you to build the trust stronger.... I think this is the answer you are looking for depending on what connection you are looking for
If it stores any type of objects mixed, use Object as storage class. All classes inherit from Object and for primitives use their respective wrapper classes. Or just use one of the bazillion container classes that already exist.
Answer:
The key difference between a library and a framework is “Inversion of Control”. When you call a method from a library, you are in control. But with a framework, the control is inverted:the framework calls you
Explanation:
A library performs specific, well-defined operations.
A framework is a skeleton where the application defines the "meat" of the operation by filling out the skeleton. The skeleton still has code to link up the parts but the most important work is done by the application.
Examples of libraries: Network protocols, compression, image manipulation, string utilities, regular expression evaluation, math. Operations are self-contained.
Examples of frameworks: Web application system, Plug-in manager, GUI system. The framework defines the concept but the application defines the fundamental functionality that end-users care about.
A physical CPU core without hyper-threading enabled can process two instructions at the same time is a false statement.
<h3>Can a CPU do multiple things at once?</h3>
Computers are those that do only one task (or process) at a single time. But a computer can alter tasks very fast and can do a lot of work.
The Central processing unit is known to be the brain of the computer system and without it, the computer cannot function or be turn on.
Hence, A physical CPU core without hyper-threading enabled can process two instructions at the same time is a false statement.
Learn more about CPU from
brainly.com/question/474553
#SPJ1
Was this in reference to literal audio archives? If so, I don't see any cons beside possible copyright infringement.
If you're talking about the codecs themselves, then I can do that.
<span>Pros:
</span>- Widespread acceptance. Supported in nearly all hardware devices, and continually adopted by newer ones.
- Faster decoding. Much more so than FLAC, Vorbis, etc.
- Relaxed licensing schedule.
<span>Cons:
</span><span>
</span>- Lower quality and efficiency than most modern codecs. (To be fair, never really noticed this one).
- Sometimes the maximum bitrate isn't enough.
- Pretty much void/unusable for high definition audio (higher than <span>48kHz).</span>
