Answer:
The correct answer is C:
Kumho Tire Co. Ltd V. Daubert
Explanation:
In this case, the appellant (Daubert) has sued Kumho Tire Co. Ltd (the defendant) when 3 months prior the right rear tyre of his car exploded while the car was in motion killing a passenger and injuring others severely.
The appellant employed the services of an expert who had worked for 10 years with Michelin to give his opinion as having studied the attributes of the tire technology.
In a counter-argument, the defendant rather than dispute the opinion of the expert urged the court to exclude it as evidence because his methodology didn't conform to the requirements of the Law as given in Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
True to the defendants' position, the Law by the ruling in Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals required that for the opinion to count, it had to be scientifically correct. It was hence excluded as evidence in the case.
Cheers!
0.036549 rounded to three sigfig is 0.037
Answer:
The third option "A molecule of a compound is composed of at least two types of atoms" is correct
Explanation:
This question isn't about molecules, it's about elements and compounds.
Elements are made of one and only one type of atoms, while compounds are made of more than one type of atoms.
(Molecules are just groups of atoms, it doesn't matter what they're made of)
<span>The answer is false. Transverse waves are waves that oscillate perpendicular to the direction of the wave. Examples of transverse waves is that of electromagnetic radiation and seismic S waves. The other type of wave is longitudinal waves that oscillates in the same plane as the direction of the wave. An example, of longitudinal waves, is sound waves and seismic P-waves</span>
