The correct answer is <span>Calcium
The question might be phrased in a complicated manner, but the answer is simple. Calcium is essential for bone support and strength which is why dairy products are highly important and should be consumed on a daily basis.</span>
Before WWII Japan had a <em>Oligarchy government</em>, kind of a military dictatorship; and when the U.S. occupied Japan after the war, political institutions were took apart through the <em>SCAP</em> policy (<em>a set of standards for security policies</em>) transitioning from Oligarchy to Democracy, they tried to get rid of their imperial system, but there was not a complete agreement on that, so only the position of Imperialism was replaced with democracy.
<span>A traditional phone message includes the following cues of a face-to-face conversation
: </span>the words that are spoken to convey the message and the voice (the tone, inflection, and volume) of the voice used to deliver the message.
Telephone or email communication lacks important nonverbal cues: the visual aids (pictures, videos, and charts) that help understand the message and facial expressions.
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
