Answer:
Letter writing
Text messaging
Email
Telegram
Telephone call
Through printed materials
Through television
Radio
Fax messaging
National dailies
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Thematic Apperception Test(TAT).
Explanation:
This is a form of test in which the subjects involved in it are been asked to tell a story explaining what is happening in the picture including the events that led up to the scene, what is happening in the scene, what each of the characters is thinking or feeling, and what happens next.
Here, the complete version of the TAT includes 31 picture cards depicting a variety of ambiguous social scenes that may include men, women, and also maybe children. Many practitioners today utilize
a lot of cards which ranges between 5 and 12 of such cards, often selected because the examiner feels that the scene matches the client's needs and situation.
The Code of Hammurabi (dated from 1754 BC), by King Hammurabi himself, established laws that helped structure and regulate social order in Mesopotamia. In this way, he was the creator of the first written laws.
The imaginary trial gives us an insight of the participants of the process (judge, witnesses, the accuser and defendant) and the different steps that take place during the process. After the accusation, the judge consults the Code of Hammurabi, and determines what penalty will be given to the Shepherd. So, by describing the imaginary trial of the Shepherd who stole the nobleman's sheep, the author shows how the Code of Hammurabi might apply to a specific situation.
Answer:
Government is predicated upon the initiation of force. For example, if you were to stop paying your taxes, you would get a letter from the IRS saying you owe such and such amount. They would keep sending you these letters for a while, but eventually they would send a group of men with badges and guns to throw you in a cage for not giving this institution YOUR money.
Courts are often crowded because of overcriminalization (prosecuting individuals for victimless crimes) and there is no price associated with criminal cases. Cases often get plea bargained because prosecutors have an incentive to have high conviction rates, not to serve their clients since they are paid by the state. This often means that crimes that are easier to prosecute get more attention.
Also you have the current problem where people sue each other willy nilly. This problem could be solved by simply requiring the person who brings suit to pay for the defendant's legal expenses if the defendant is proven innocent of any wrongdoing.
Also the victim of a crime in our current system gets screwed twice. Once by the offender who perpetrated the crime, then again by the state, which confiscates his wealth in order to pay for the prosecution and housing of the criminal. Historically private law was centered around compensating the victim financially.
In absence of a state professional judges would emerge that would make decisions based on a commonly established practices which could be codified into a law book. This would be analogous to how dictionaries codify definitions for words, you don’t need a central body to come up with new words and definitions, language emerges spontaneously. So too, law would be established in this way and in fact this is what English common law is based on, communal law that was established and accepted by the community. Similarly customs would emerge for the amount of times you can appeal, based on the crime committed.
Private law would solve many of the above problems listed. It would eliminate overcriminalization (it would be unlikely that someone would bring suit against someone for using drugs), it would focus on restitution and lawyers would be working for the victims instead of simply working for a high conviction rate.
