The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
Answer:
You can consult Jschlatt about this topic, but until then I think I'll do.
Explanation:
In general, they don't care. That's why it's a sweatshop and not a normal business. The employers are typically in it for the money, which is why the conditions are so unideal (understatement). Someone who valued human life wouldn't force underpaid, malnourished children (or adults for that matter) to work in such horrible circumstances.
Arab traders brought to Africa the religion of Islam.
Question Options:
a. exit
b. voice
c. loyalty
d. social voice
e. neglect
Answer: The NEGLECT response.
Explanation: The neglect response is a type of conflict response that occurs when an individual by any means possible avoids an issue because they believe that things might get worse with their response. This is a model studied in organizational behaviour and comparative politics. The neglect response in an organisation's setting involves reducing work efforts, paying less attention to quality, and increasing absenteeism and lateness.
Options a) and c) essentially say the same thing: that cultures do not change. But it's not true. Thing about how the smartphones are changing our culture now.
Culture is also not inherited as the children of immigrants often identify with the culture of their country and not the culture of their parents.
So the correct answer is d. Cultures are fluid.
