1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jenyasd209 [6]
3 years ago
13

It is estimated that approximately 8.1% of Americans are afflicted with diabetes. Suppose that a certain diagnostic evaluation f

or diabetes correctly diagnoses 95% of all adults over 40 with diabetes as having the disease and incorrectly diagnoses 3.5% of all adults over 40 without diabetes as having the disease. Use this information and a theoretical group of 10,000 Americans to construct a table for this testing scenario. Round all answers and results to two decimal places. Test Positive Test Negative Total Have Diabetes Do not have Diabetes Total 10,000 What percentage of Americans who test positive for diabetes would we expect to actually have the disease? What percentage of Americans who test negative for diabetes would we expect to actually have the disease? What percentage of Americans who test positive will not have the disease?
Mathematics
1 answer:
denis23 [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Multiple answers

Step-by-step explanation:

Considering that 8.1% of Americans have the disease:

If our theoretical group is of 10,000. We know that the 8.1% of our group have diabetes, so we multiplify 10,000 × .081(the percentaje) = 810. This is the total of adults in our group that have diabetes.

Now:

  • Test Positive:
  1. We know that the test correctly diagnoses 95% of adults with diabetes. In our case the total of adults with diabetes is 810, so we multiplify 810 × .95(percentaje) = 769.50.  
  2. We know too that the test incorrectly diagnoses 3.5% of the adults. In our case the total of adults with diabetes is 810, so we multiplify 810 × .035(percentaje) = 28.35.
  3. The total of adults the test diagnoses positive with diabetes should be the correctly and incorrectly we calculate previously. 769.50 + 28.35 = 797.85
  • Test Negative:
  1. The total of test negative diagnoses should be the total of our group less the positive diagnoses. 10,000 - 797.85 = 9,202.15
  • Total do not have diabetes:
  1. The total of adults do not have diabetes is the total of our group less the total of adults in our group that have diabetes. 10,000 - 810 = 9190

We expect that only the 95% of test positive for diabetes have the disease.

  1. 810 × .95(percentaje) = 769.50.

We expect that only the 5% (100% - 95% of test positive) of the 8.1% of americans afflicted with diabetes of negative test actually have the disease. 8.1 × .05(percentaje) = .40%, 9,202.15 ×.004(percentaje) = 36.80.

The 3.5% of Americans who test positive will not have the disease because this is the percentaje that the test incorrectly diagnoses.

You might be interested in
Analyze the diagram below and complete the instructions that follow?
yan [13]

Answer:

The exact value of tan(M) is 5/12 ⇒ answer (C)

Step-by-step explanation:

* Lets revise the trigonometry functions

- In ΔABC

# m∠B = 90°

# Length of AB = a , length of BC = b and length of AC = c

# The trigonometry functions of angle C are

- sin(C) = a/c ⇒ opposite side to ∠C ÷ the hypotenuse

- cos(C) = b/c ⇒ adjacent side to ∠C ÷ the hypotenuse

- tan(c) = a/b ⇒ opposite side to ∠C ÷ adjacent side to ∠C

* Now lets solve the problem

- In ΔONM

∵ m∠N = 90°

∵ MN = 12

∵ ON = 5

∵ tan(M) = ON/NM ⇒ opposite side of ∠(M) ÷ adjacent side of ∠(M)

∴ tan(M) = 5/12

* The exact value of tan(M) is 5/12

6 0
3 years ago
Which triangle is possible?
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

  (a)  3 ft, 4 ft, 5 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

The triangle inequality requires the sum of the two short sides exceed the long side.

__

a) 3 ft + 4 ft = 7 ft > 5 ft . . . . . triangle is possible

b) 4 yd + 1 2/3 yd = 5 2/3 yd < 10 yd . . . . not a possible triangle

c) 3 ft + 3 ft = 6 ft < 7 ft . . . . not a possible triangle

d) 4 in + 4 in = 8 in . . . . not a possible triangle (not greater than 8 in)

__

The first set of side lengths can form a triangle: 3 ft, 4 ft, 5 ft.

7 0
2 years ago
If you continue adding fractions according to this pattern when will you reach a sum of 2?
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

You will never be able to reach the sum of 2

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
5) HELP I don't know what I got incorrect can you please give me the answer and the step by step, THANK YOU SO MUCH TYSM!!!
MariettaO [177]
Same as moren.. sorry
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Of the original 56 signers of the declaration of independence four of them are present in North Carolina if you selected one sig
kari74 [83]
The chance of you selecting one randomly is 4/56, which simplifies to 1/14.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following transformations preserves orientation, but does NOT preserve congruence?
    9·1 answer
  • A manufacturer produces mugs at a cost of $2 daily. The company also has daily costs of $500. It then sells the mugs for $5. Wha
    7·1 answer
  • 17 - (9 + 10) = (17 - 9) + 10 A.True B.False
    9·2 answers
  • How do I do #11? (Each part of it)
    7·1 answer
  • Write the equation of line whose b= -1 and m=5
    8·2 answers
  • The scatter plot shows the number of days that several homes have been for sale co.pared to the number of times the house has be
    14·2 answers
  • AB is a diameter of the circle, CD is a chord equal to the radius of the circle. AC and BD when extented intersect at a point E.
    11·1 answer
  • A shopkeeper decided to make equal rate of profit in each of fancy items. If he sold a jacket costing Rs 4400 for Rs 5060 at wha
    13·1 answer
  • HELP ASAPP!!!Select the correct answer.
    14·2 answers
  • What is 3(2x + 1) written as in distributive property
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!