I don't think so as long as you make it apparent that the information comes the same source. So citing over and over again is unnecessary as long as it's clear that the information is from the same website or source. If you can't make it clear that they are from the same website source, it would a safe choice to continue to cite to avoid allegations of plagiarism.
V=IR however in this case we will rearrange it into R= V/I. Which leads to R=15.0/0.30. And your answer becomes 50.
That's called an "acceleration" or "slowing down".
Based on the length of side of the cube given, the length of the needle is 2.28 inches.
<h3>What is the length of the needle?</h3>
The length of the side of a cube and its diagonal are related by the formula below:
where s is length of side
Therefore, the length of the needle is 2.28 inches
Learn more about length of diagonal of cube at: brainly.com/question/800212
#SPJ4
Answer:
Maximum height reached = 39.39 m
Explanation:
At maximum height
We have equation of motion v² = u² + 2as
Consider the vertical motion of baseball,
Initial velocity, u = 32.1sin60=27.8 m/s
Final velocity, v = 0 m/s
Acceleration, a = -9.81 m/s²
Substituting
v² = u² + 2as
0 = 27.8² + 2 x (-9.81) x s
s = 39.39 m
Maximum height reached = 39.39 m
