Answer:
30 minutes
Explanation:
Energy per time is constant, so:
E₁ / t₁ = E₂ / t₂
m₁C₁ΔT₁ / t₁ = m₂C₂ΔT₂ / t₂
(1 kg) C (70°C − 25°C) / 15 min = (1.5 kg) C (80°C − 20°C) / t
(1 kg) (45°C) / 15 min = (1.5 kg) (60°C) / t
3/min = 90 / t
t = 30 min
Answer:
Explanation:
Given:
- mass of car,
- distance of skidding after the application of brakes,
- coefficient of kinetic friction,
<u>So, the energy dissipated during the skidding of car:</u>
<em>Frictional force:</em>
where N = normal reaction by ground on the car
<em>Now from the work-energy equivalence:</em>
is the dissipated energy.
Answer:
1700 Joules
Explanation:
Work=force x distance
Force = 170 kg
Distance= 10 Meters
170 x 10 = 1700 Joules of work
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
When a liquid changes to gas, this phase change is called vaporization or evaporization.
