The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is part of the _____.

Social Studies

2 answers:

Murljashka [212]3 years ago

8 0

Is part of the executive office

inn [45]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is part of the Executive Office of the President of the United States.

Explanation:

The Office of Management and Budget is a US government service whose primary mission is to assist the President of the United States in the task of budget preparation.

The OMB assists the White House in the task of preparing the federal budget of the United States States, monitors the implementation of programs by federal agencies, verifies compliance with government policies and procedures, and sets budget priorities. The OMB ensures that agency reports, procedures and proposed legislation are in line with the budget set by the Presidency and regulations.

You might be interested in

Which of these was not a weakness of the Articles of Confederation?

Tomtit [17]

I believe the answer is: C.<span> majority vote required

The problems of the articles of consideration exist on the total number of votes that would be given to each states. Some advocate that all the states should have equal number of votes while the other advocate that they need to consider states' size and population into the number of votes.</span>

7 0

2 years ago

Which economy has or had a strong mixed economy

LuckyWell [14K]

The United States has one. China is becoming mixed after being strictly communist.

3 0

3 years ago

Why was the end of world war ii the beginning of a new era

Sergio039 [100]

There are several reasons the end of WWII was the beginning of a new era. Many countries in Africa and Asia gained independence from their colonial overlords. Two super powers emerged from the war, the USA and the USSR. The Cold War began and the American economy boomed.

6 0

3 years ago

How can neutral countries (like the U.S.) support their allies without actually going to war?

djverab [1.8K]

They can provide the country with money and supplies like the US did in the early parts of world war I and World War II.

7 0

3 years ago

Grant and sherman used the strategy of total war. do you think the end justifies the means? that is did defeting the confederacy

bija089 [108]

Grant and Sherman used the strategy of total war to shorten the war in their favor, using the many deaths of enemies to save lives on their side. We may never know if more would've died if they didn't use the tactic, but in my opinion civilian lives were not theirs to take. Soldiers agreed to die, but civilians didn't, making total war, in my opinion, not right. Others may say that their lives were a necessary sacrifice towards a common goal, but, in my opinion, if one side uses total war, can't the other side use it too for a horrible end? Form your own opinion, but that is mine.

3 0

3 years ago