The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence.
<h3>What is illegally obtained evidence?</h3>
The term illegally Obtained Evidence is known to be the type of evidence that can be made or gotten that is against the normal way of obtaining evidence.
Note that The 1961 Mapp v. Ohio case that went before the warren court was related to the right to a court-appointed attorney because of the use of illegally obtained evidence and this can influence the judgement made.
Learn more about evidence from
brainly.com/question/1256677
#SPJ4
Answer:
Crittenden Compromise
Explanation:
made up of six proposed constitutional amendments and four proposed Congressional resolutions that he was hpoing would appease Southern states and help the nation avoid a civil war.
support by the South and not by the North, it was a failure.
The naturalization process involves: application, examination, and court hearing. True or False
The answer is true.
Answer: TRUE .
_____________________________________________________________
(This includes "increased risk" of: cardiovascular diseases; diabetes (and diabetic-related conditions, such as neuropathies); circulation disorders; dental health problems; psychiatric conditions (depression and anxiety disorders, in particular); and ultimately, slower healing time when physical injuries/accidents answer (because the immune system has to fight harder).
_____________________________________________________________
