1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zvonat [6]
3 years ago
7

At 20°C the vapor pressure of benzene (C6H6) is 75 torr, and that of toluene (C7H8) is 22 torr. Assume that benzene and toluene

form an ideal solution. What is the composition in mole fractions of a solution that has a vapor pressure of 40. torr at 20°C?
Chemistry
1 answer:
valina [46]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The mole fraction of benzene will be 0.34 and mole fraction of toluene is 0.66

Explanation:

According to Raoult's law, the vapor pressure of a component at a given temperature is equal to the mole fraction of that component multiplied by the vapor pressure of that component in the pure state.

p_1=x_1p_1^0 and p_2=x_2P_2^0

where, x = mole fraction in solution

p^0 = pressure in the pure state

According to Dalton's law, the total pressure is the sum of individual pressures.

p_{total}=p_1+p_2\\p_{total}=x_{benzene}p_{benzene}^0+x_{toluene}P_{toluene}^0

x_{benzene}=x,

x_{toluene}=1-x_{benzene}=1-x,

p_{benzene}^0=75torr

p_{toluene}^0=22torr

p_{total}=40torr

40=x\times 75+(1-x)\times 22

x=0.34

Thus (1-x0 = (1-0.34)=0.66

Thus the mole fraction of benzene will be 0.34 and that of toluene is 0.66

You might be interested in
What is the ph of a peach with a [ –oh] = 3.2 × 10 –11 m?
3241004551 [841]

Answer:

Amerigo Vespucci, was the first European to reach the Caribbean Islands.

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

T

F

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
If a car travels 400.0 meters in 20.0 seconds, how fast is it going?<br> m/s<br> Please help me
Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

20m/s.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
1
Alex Ar [27]
River Banks? I'm not completely sure but hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Increased use of incineration is sometimes advocated as a safe way to dispose of chemical waste. But opponents of incineration p
pochemuha

Answer:

Option A is correct.

At the two incinerators at which leaks were reported, staff had had only cursory training on the proper procedures for incinerating chemical waste.

Explanation:

The main aim of the argument presented is to talk down the use of burning by incinerators method to dispose chemical waste. The argument presents great points in that there were 40 incidents at two existing commissioned incinerators in the last year where unexpected releases of dangerous chemical agents happened.

So, basically, the argument is all about how the high frequency of the unsuspected release of dangerous chemical agents should discourage this method of chemical waste disposal.

The argument then concluded that if more chemical waste are disposed using the burning by incinerator method, there will be more unsuspected release of dangerous chemicals.

We are then required to find the statement that most weakens the conclusion that there will be more toxic releases if more chemical waste are burned.

Analysing the Statements one by one

Statement A

This statement provides a possible reason for this high frequency of dangerous chemical releases. It states that the staff haven't been properly trained. So, this means that properly training the staff should most likely lead to lesser cases of toxic releases into the environment.

This is the statement that most weakens the conclusion.

Statement B

The conclusion wasn't about the incinerator method being the safest method. It was about whether increased incineration would lead to more toxic relaeses. So, this doesn't affect the conclusion.

Statement C

This statement says that incineration can be increased without building new incinerators by tapping into unused capacity at the old incinerators. Also doesn't affect rhe conclusion whether increased use of incineration will lead to more toxic leaks.

Statement D

This statement strengthens the argument; which is the opposite of what we're aiming to achieve.

Statement E

This statement hints that the toxic leaks do not have that much of a harmful effect because the toxic releases do not go beyond the property of the incinerator. This also doesnt tackle the conclusion about the frequency of leaks, it only addresses how not harmful the toxic leaks can be.

Hope this Helps!!!

5 0
3 years ago
Terms that are true of respiration reaction (such C6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O) include?
scoray [572]
D
Explicating hit brained
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Consider the following equilibrium:
    8·2 answers
  • How is the tempature related to phsyical change
    10·1 answer
  • Which elements have atoms that are likely to form an anion?
    6·1 answer
  • What is antifreeze used for?
    10·2 answers
  • given a mixture of lead to oxide ammonium chloride and sodium chloride describe how a mixture can be separated to obtain a sampl
    8·1 answer
  • __C + __H2O → __CO + H2
    12·1 answer
  • During photosynthesis, plant cells use sunlight as an energy source; animal cells cannot do this. What substance do Animal cells
    13·1 answer
  • What type of reaction is the following:
    9·2 answers
  • Someone pls help me I will make you brain
    13·1 answer
  • A breakfast of cereal, orange juice, and milk might contain 230 nutritional Calories. How much is this in Joules?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!