Answer:
Bob Katz and Sally Mander
Taxable Income for 2018:
= $78,200
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Total wages = $102,400
Gain from sale of stock = 5,200
Interest income = 100
Total income = $107,700
less total deductions = (29,500)
Taxable Income = $78,200
b) Bob Katz and Sally Mander will have taxable income of $78,200 when the appropriate rate of tax is applied and the tax liability obtained, then the $1,500 tax credit will be deducted before arriving at the tax liability due.
c) The short-term capital gain of $5,200 is taxed as ordinary income. Since it is held for less than a year, it will be included in the taxable income for that year and it follows the same tax brackets as ordinary income. On the other hand, the long-term capital gain of $13,000 will attract a tax rate of 0 percent for a taxable income of $78,200. Otherwise, it will attract a tax rate of 15 percent or 20 percent, depending on income level. This means that long-term capital gains tax rates are much lower than the ordinary income tax rate.
Answer:
Justified Alignment
Explanation:
The type of text alignment that is frequently seen in newspaper,magazines,and books(both the left and the right sides of the paragraph are perfectly straight).I'm sorry if it was wrong.
brainliest plz ;-;
Answer:
All of The Above
Explanation:
They all make sense in terms of budget
Answer:
3.46
Explanation:
Calculation for Campbell Co. fixed asset turnover ratio
First step is to find the Average net fixed assets
Using this formula
Average Fixed assets= Fixed assets Beginning balance +Fixed assets ending balance /2
Let plug in the formula
Average Fixed assets= $368,000 + $396,000/ 2
Average Fixed assets=$764,000/2
Average Fixed assets=$382,000
Second step is to calculate for the Fixed asset turnover
Using this formula
Fixed asset turnover = Net revenue ÷ Average net fixed assets
Let plug in the formula
Fixed asset turnover= $1,320,000 ÷ $382,000
Fixed asset turnover= 3.46
Therefore Campbell Co. fixed asset turnover ratio will be 3.46
Answer:
The conditions under which each funding method for paying for IT system expenses would be recommended are:
Allocation method is preferred to other methods when actual usage cannot be captured but, some other cost drivers can be used as the allocation bases.
Chargeback method works better than others when actual usage by each unit can be accurately captured.
Explanation:
The Allocation Funding Method charges IT costs to individuals, departments, or business units based on revenues, number of employees, and other cost drivers and not based on usage. It is often used when actual usage cannot be recorded.
The chargeback method charges IT costs to individuals, departments, or business units based on their actual usage of the IT services. With wide variation in IT usage, business units need to be charged their actual costs consumed.
The corporate budget method allocates IT cost based on a periodic predetermined rate. It is used where unit managers need to be given control over their budgets, enabling them to search for cost-saving technologies.
