Who were the scalawags ans carpetbaggers?

What type of democracy means that the people hold the ultimate power but policy decisions are made through elected representativ

snow_lady [41]

The answer is "<span>Democratic republic".
</span>
A democratic republic is a type of government working on standards received from a republic and a vote based system. As opposed to being a cross between two altogether isolate frameworks, law based republics may work on standards shared by the two republics and democracies.

5 0

3 years ago

17. In 2001, the Bush administration passed the...,

katovenus [111]

Answer:

state autonomy to decide on education issues

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When the Framers were designing the federal government, they believed that the House of Representatives would be "the people’s"

Kay [80]

This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.

The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.

First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.

Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.

Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.

4 0

3 years ago

Which two statements explain how the 2018 farm bill and federal crop insurance act transformed hemp policy in the united states?

natta225 [31]

The two statements which described the Farm Bill and Federal Corp Act changing the hemp policy in US country exist the approval of hemp cultivation for the production of medical marijuana and permitting the farmers to transport hemp across the state.

The 2018 farm bill or Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 stands as a legislated United States farm bill that reauthorized $867 billion for numerous expenditures approved in the prior farm bill. The bill existed enacted by the Senate and House on December 11 and 12, 2018, respectively.

It is an agricultural Improvement Act that existed formed in 2018. Here, cannabis existed legalized for cultivation and sales, and cannabis was redefined with the bill. Therefore, the two statements that defined the 2018 farm act are that it agreed on national hemp cultivation for producing medical marijuana and it became legal for agriculturalists to transport hemp across state lines.

The complete question is,

Which two statements explain how the 2018 Farm Bill and Federal Crop Insurance Act transformed hemp policy in the United States?

It authorized farmers to grow hemp without a license.

It approved national hemp cultivation for producing medical marijuana.

It became legal for farmers to transport hemp across state lines.

It allowed hemp farmers to buy insurance if their hemp crops were destroyed.

It permitted hemp farmers to avoid Chinese tariffs.

To learn more about 2018 Farm bill refer to:

brainly.com/question/27268458

#SPJ4

7 0

1 year ago

What happened as a result of the so-called Intolerable Acts?

Delvig [45]

I'm pretty sure it's C, it makes the most sense.

3 0

3 years ago