Answer:
All of the following are effective practices for managing public information after a mass casualty incident EXCEPT:
Option A: Avoid the media or tell them "no comment" until all facts have been collected and verified.
Explanation:
Mass casualty accident is the one in which number of patients are more than the number of available local resources. It needs emergency arrangements which should be exceptional and also requires additional medical assistance.
So, in this case, one should make information available in all formats like the one that is culturally appropriate and age-specific groups as mentioned in Option B. Also, community partners can unite as one and inform via through a Public Information Officer, as Option C. Also, updated information should be sent as it becomes available as per Option D.
Thus, Option A is the statement that must not be practiced.
Answer:
Equilibrium or Homeostasis. Both which mean equal.
Explanation:
Answer:
C). The list outlined how the British broke the social contract.
Explanation:
Jefferson provides the 'list of grievances of the colonists against the Britishers' to outline the manner in which 'British snapped the social contract.' It highlights how the Britishers denied the required social cooperation, principles, and the rights of the colonists. This denial of social compliance led to the oppression of the weaker sections of the society which Jefferson pinpoints through his speech and justifies that why the Declaration of Independence was necessary. Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Yes because if we look at the two party system there are lots of flaws in it essentially the minorities voices are less heard because if their values don’t align with anyone then they may choose to not vote which causes a low voter turnout since i’d say the two main parties have pretty big differences in views especially depending on the leader of the party, if they went to proportional representation like sweden everyone’s voices would be heard and it would be easier to make decisions and a higher voting turnout because more party’s to choose from so it would give plurality to the system.
<span>On one side it had the Nile which was difficult to cross if the Egyptians didn't want people to cross it. On two sides there was a desert and one the north there was the sea. If Egypt wanted to isolate itself or be defensive in a war it had no problems doing so. It could easily restrict access of foreign cultures.</span>
