Explanation:
Numerous Christians have suffered persecutions by non-Christians and even other Christians of diverse or more or less strict beliefs during the history of Christianity.
Such persecutions have or had varying degrees of intensity, from unsecured arrest, diminishing public rights, imprisonment, flogging and torture, to execution, called martyrdom, through the payment of a supplementary tax - as the case. of the Mozarabs - the confiscation of their property or even the destruction of their property, their art, their books and their symbols or the incitement to renounce their principles and betray other Christians.
Answer:
proactive; retroactive
Explanation:
Proactive interference: The term proactive interference refers to the process when an individual's old memories hinder him or her from retaining new memories.
Retroactive interference: The term retroactive interference refers to the process when an individual's new memories hinder him or her from retaining old memories. In other words, the new memories of a person disrupts the old memories.
In the question above, Katie is experiencing proactive interference, whereas Laurel is experiencing retroactive interference.
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
I believe the answer is option a
According to christian beliefs, Jesus was sent to earth to :
Save mankind from Sin
according to them, He sacrificed his own life in order to spare the humans
hope this helps
