Answer:
The best allocation base for assembling activities costs are the number of parts actually assembled.
Since the number of parts is not an option int his question, the second best allocation base for the assembling process is A) direct labor hours.
If the process is highly automated, then the second best allocation base would be machine hours, but that isn't an option either.
Explanation:
The computation of the activity rate for each activity is shown below:
As we know that
Activity Rate = Expected rate ÷ Activity Driver
For Handling material = $650,000 ÷ 100,000 = $6.50 per part
For Inspecting product = $925,000 ÷ 1,500 parts = $616.67 per batch
For Processing purchase orders = $130,000 ÷ 700 = $185.72 per orders
Paying supplies = $200,000 ÷ 500 = 400 per invoices
Insuring the factory = $325,000 ÷ $40,000 = $8.125 per square foot
Designing packaging = $100,000 ÷ 2 models = 50,000 per models
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
Total expenses:
= mortgage interest + property tax + utilities and maintenance + Depreciation expense
= $5,000 + $600 + $900 + $3,500
= $10,000
Proportionate rental expenses = Total expenses × 
Proportionate rental expenses = 10,000 ×
= $7,200
Rental Loss = Rental Income - Proportionate rental expenses
= $4,000 - $7,200
= -($3,200)
Answer:
$570,000
Explanation:
Missing question: <em>"On December 31, 2022,50,000 SARs are exercised by executives. What amount of compensation expense should Korsak recognize for the year ended December 31, 2020"</em>
Amount of compensation expense = [(33-20)*120,000*3/4] - [(30-20)*120,000*2/4]
Amount of compensation expense = [13*120,000*3/4] - [10*120,000*2/4]
Amount of compensation expense = 1,170,000 - 600,000
Amount of compensation expense = $570,000
So. the amount of compensation expense that Korsak should recognize for the year ended December 31, 2020 is $570,000.
Because Demand is up and supply is down companies are going to start demanding a higher price for their product since there are less on the market
