How is solving a literal equation similar to solving a standard equation??

1 answer:

8 0

Sometimes you have a formula, such as something from geometry, and you need to solve for some variable other than the "standard" one. For instance, the formula for the perimeter P of a square with sides of length s is P = 4s. You might need to solve this equation for s, so you can plug in a perimeter and figure out the side length.

This process of solving a formula for a given variable is called "solving literal equations". One of the dictionary definitions of "literal" is "related to or being comprised of letters", and variables are sometimes referred to as literals. So "solving literal equations" seems to be another way of saying "taking an equation with lots of letters, and solving for one letter in particular."

At first glance, these exercises appear to be much worse than your usual solving exercises, but they really aren't that bad. You pretty much do what you've done all along for solving linear equations<span> and other sorts of equation; the only substantial difference is that, due to all the variables, you won't be able to simplify your answers as much as you're used to. </span>

You might be interested in

Imagine a world in which only decimals, not fractions, are used. How would your life be different?

nataly862011 [7]

I used to hate fractions. But in time, you learn to love them. This is because there's a big difference between fractions and decimals, even though when you divide the actual fraction it comes out to a decimal. Decimals go on and on sometimes, and it would be impossible to write out all those numbers, especially when taking a timed test, for example. Fractions, in this case, would be much more useful (as long as you know how to use them to your advantage). Fractions are basically all those decimal numbers wrapped up into a single, simple division. It makes the outcome of your answer much more accurate than if you estimate every decimal you get throughout a math problem. The more you estimate throughout the problem-solving process, the less accurate your final answer will be. Hence why teachers will usually tell you to estimate when you're putting down the final answer. Fractions are complex at times, so it may be easier to use them in decimal form for certain situations (especially if the decimal form is short and sweet). A world without fractions will result in many, many inaccurate situations involving mathematical knowledge.

3 0

2 years ago

catriona earned 16 more stickers than Peter. she earned 35 stickers. how many stickers did Peter earn?

expeople1 [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If Catriona has 16 more stickers than Peter than the only thing you have to do is subtract and find the difference

5 0

3 years ago

HELP!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

FrozenT [24]

Number one: Just plot down on the number like the numbers you have. Just took the test for this.

3 0

2 years ago

Work out 2/3 X 2 plz help

Romashka [77]

$\frac{2}{3}$ × 2
2 = $\frac{2}{1}$

Numerator × numerator
Denominator × denominator

$\frac{2}{3}$ × $\frac{2}{1}$
$\frac{4}{3}$

7 0

2 years ago

Please help IM SO CONFUSED!

rodikova [14]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You can see from the table that 2 bracelets are made every 30 minutes.

There are 9 intervals of 30 minutes each in 4.5 hours.

So, the number of bracelets that are made in 4.5 hours is

9x2=18

Another way to see this is to note from the table that 4 bracelets are made in 60 minute, which is 1 hour. So, in 4 hours, 16 bracelets will be made. Also, from the table, 2 bracelets are made in 30 minutes, which is 1/2 hour. So, adding up, 18 bracelets are made in 4.5 hours.

4 0

2 years ago