When CaSO4 → Ca2+ + SO4
So when we have Ksp = [Ca2+][SO4]
when Ksp = 4.93 x 10^-5
and [SO4] = 0.02 M
so by substitution we can get [Ca2+]
4.93x10^-5 = [Ca2+] [0.02]
∴ [Ca2+] = 0.0025 mol/L
∴ the moles of calcium chloride = 0.0025 mol / L * 1.5 L
= 0.00167 mol
Loess, which can be carried by wind over long distances.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Pasted below is his 5 theory's and all of them are the building blocks of chemistry today.
1. Matter is made up of atoms that are indivisible and indestructible.
2. All atoms of an element are identical.
3. Atoms of different elements have different weights and different chemical properties.
4. Atoms of different elements combine in simple whole numbers to form compounds.
5. Atoms cannot be created or destroyed. When a compound decomposes, the atoms are recovered unchanged.
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.