They work for dirt cheap, and work hard because they want to keep the work they receive, an immigrants usual only hope is a steady work whether or not they're illegal.
The onion model, which elaborates on social penetration as a process by which people "peel back" layers of personal knowledge about others through interpersonal interaction to reach the core, is a good metaphor for explaining how social penetration theory functions.
To learn about someone's "core self," or the most private aspects of that person takes time. The surface of a person that is visible to many others is their public image. The innermost parts of a person, known only to close relationships through disclosure over time, constitute the private self.
The surface, medium, inner, and core personality layers are only a few of the levels that are described by the social penetration hypothesis. Rather superficial information, like preferences for certain types of music and clothing, makes up the superficial layers. In computer-mediated communication contexts like online dating and virtual teams, the theory has also been applied.
To learn more about the social penetration theory:
brainly.com/question/13615011
#SPJ4
I'd say B.
It wasn't the last battle that's for sure, and there were not that many American casualties.
Answer:
This is an example of:
B. lowering prices for customers.
Explanation:
<u>In a competitive market, it is common for companies to try and offer a cheaper product. In most situations, being cheaper means the product has more chances of attracting customers when compared to expensive ones. A way to make a cheaper product is by decreasing production costs using cheaper materials, as is mentioned in the question.</u> Of course, the product will have its price lowered, but its quality may also decrease with the use of a cheaper material. Anyway, the situation described is an example of lowering prices for customers.
that statement is false
after both sides rest their cases, both the defendant's attorney and the plaintiff's attorney would each give a closing statement. They would most likely use this opportunity to appeal to both logic and emotion of the juries in order to gain support for the voting.
